搜档网
当前位置:搜档网 › The Willy Wagtail Tale Knowledge Management andE-Learning Enriching Multiliteracies in the Early

The Willy Wagtail Tale Knowledge Management andE-Learning Enriching Multiliteracies in the Early

The Willy Wagtail Tale Knowledge Management andE-Learning Enriching Multiliteracies in the Early
The Willy Wagtail Tale Knowledge Management andE-Learning Enriching Multiliteracies in the Early

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 251

The Willy Wagtail Tale: Knowledge Management and E-Learning Enriching Multiliteracies in the Early Years

Sandra Hesterman*

School of Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia

E-mail: s.hesterman@https://www.sodocs.net/doc/0d9032086.html,.au

*Corresponding author

Abstract: While our multimedia world,with rapid advances in technologies,

now challenges educators to consider new pedagogies that expand cultural and

linguistic diversity, the potential for information and communication

technologies (ICT) to support literacy learning in the early years remains a

seriously under-researched area. There is an urgency to address a range of

questions raised by teacher practitioners such as what new literacies will look

like in their programs, how ICT can be used to learn in new ways, and which

pedagogies of multiliteracies are relevant for early childhood education. This

paper explores these questions in relation to knowledge management initiatives

and e-learning opportunities. The Willy Wagtail Tale presents a case study of

how knowledge management and e-learning is socially constructed to enrich

multiliteracies experiences in the early years. The study occurred in a small

Western Australian school committed to the Reggio Emilia teaching approach.

Implications for educational research are that multiliteracies experiences occur

inadvertently through children’s play, are integral to The Hundred Languages

of Children, and are dramatically enriched through social constructivist

knowledge management and child-centered e-learning.

Keywords: Early Childhood, Multiliteracies, E-learning, Knowledge

Management, Reggio Emilia.

Biographical notes: Sandra Hesterman is a lecturer in education at Murdoch

University, Perth, Western Australia. Her recent research, grounded in

postmodern theories, examines how teachers integrate information and

communication technologies to enrich students’ multiliteracies experiences.

1. Introduction

It is argued by Cope and Kalantzis (2000) that 21st century students need to be equipped with skills necessary to meet the challenging and diverse demands of different forms of communication created by new technologies. These skills include the ability to interpret knowledge presented in multimedia communications; to exchange knowledge across a global community; and to generate knowledge. For students to develop competency in each of these skills requires both their use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and also teacher expertise in determining how best to manage students’ acquisition of knowledge from multi media sources. Thus, the ability to read the world, and its global meanings and messages requires skills beyond those of merely reading the word of formalized standardized English. By extension a broader definition of literacy, one that views language as both personal and pluralistic and embraces cultural and linguistic diversity, is now sought to ensure school relevancy beyond the classroom

252 Hesterman, S.

door (Loveless, DeVoogd, & Bohlin, 2001). In the literature this is known as multiliteracies (New London Group, 1996).

How times have changed! The early childhood teacher, at the coalface of education reform, is expected to integrate information and communication technologies in their teaching program to support student literacy in new and dynamic ways (Yelland, 2001). Not only do mandated curriculum documents now include studies of multimodal communications but they still emphasize the importance of learning the conventions of

standardized English. Therefore, as debate on the integration of information and communication technologies and the definition of literacy intensifies in the realms of education literature, it falls to early childhood teachers to contemplate practical considerations related to ICT program design and effective pedagogies of multiliteracies. Associated issues include identifying knowledge management practices and e-learning experiences that can build young children’s literacy. The use of information and communication technologies in e-learning to provide experiences of multiliteracies in early childhood education (ECE) and accompanying strategies of knowledge

management that can support these learning processes remains a seriously under-researched area (Lee, Yelland, O’Rourke, & Harrison, 2003).

To help fill this gap, this paper examines how e-learning can enrich multiliteracies in the early years when guided by social constructivist knowledge management. The Willy Wagtail Tale presents a classroom account of what these processes looked like in a Western Australian independent community school setting in 2005. At this school, the teachers, although unfamiliar with the term multiliteracies, recognize young students as multiliterate: readers of the world and learning to become readers of the word. These teachers are committed to the Reggio Emilia educational philosophy, which emerged after World War Two in the Reggio Emilia Province in Northern Italy. A theoretical construct aligned with this alternative teaching approach is The Hundred Languages of Children: a paradigm in which there is a myriad of symbolic representations that allow children to communicate and advance their thinking in ways that present language in different forms. This fee-paying school also directs considerable funding to ensure that young students have ready “hands on” access to quality information and communication technologies to support knowledge generation. As this case study will reveal, students are also provided with multiple opportunities to participate in multiliteracies experiences through e-learning. The Willy Wagtail Tale pro vides insight into one particular teacher’s knowledge management practices that supported such learning processes.

Before proceeding to The Willy Wagtail Tale vignette itself, however, it is important that the reader is familiar with related concepts, such as the pedagogy of multiliteracies, multimodal theory, and modes of meaning and also to establish a shared understanding of knowledge management and e-learning. Following this discussion, the relationship of multiliteracies, e-learning, and knowledge management, as depicted in The Willy Wagtail Tale, is explored to show how these three processes were entwined in an early years setting.

1.1.Pedagogy of Multiliteracies

The term multiliteracies embraces the notion that there are multiple “modes of representation [that communicate meaning] much broader than language alone” (Cope & Kalantzis, 2000, p. 5). A pedagogy of multiliteracies “encourages a broader perspective of the student as a learner and values diverse ways of knowing, thinking, doing and being” (O’Rourk e, 2005, p. 10). Consequently, critics of traditional school practices argue that the definition of literacy should be broadened to encompass more than

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 253 instructing students on how to master sound-letter correspondence (Geekie, Cambourne, & Fitzsimmons, 1999). Unsworth (2001) justified this need for change:

In the 21st century the notion of literacy needs to be reconceived as a plurality of literacies and being literate must be seen as anachronistic. As emerging technologies continue to impact on the social construction of these multiple literacies, becoming literate is the more appropriate description (p. 8).

Increasingly, it is claimed that the purpose of teaching literacy in the 21st century is to guide students in learning to read their digital world, “B ecoming literate means thinking differently than one previously did, seeing the world differently, and this suggests that there are many different literacies” (Freire, 1972; Papert, 1993, p. 10). A pedagogy of multiliteracies relevant to the early years re cognizes students’ individual readings of the world and acknowledges that there are multiple modes of meaning in addition to reading the word that can be used to communicate knowledge.

1.2.Multimodal Theory

Underpinning a pedagogy of multiliteracies is the multimodal theory that asserts that there is “…multiplicity of ways in which children make meaning…multiplicity of modes, means and materials” for self expression (Kress, 1997, p. 97). From birth, a child seeks to make and understand messages and meanings in accordance with their interests and by using available resources. Having embarked on “their own paths into literacy” long before attending school, children are recognized as multiliterate “thoroughly experienced makers of meaning” who have acquired a myriad of “symbol systems” to voice feelings, perceptions, and thought (Forman & Fyle, 1998, pp. 248-249; Kress, 1997, pp. 8 & 97). This theory challenges teachers to reflect critically on how they can provide greater latitude for students’ individual expressio ns of meaning. Exploring representational processes such as “synaesthesia”(association of sensory impression and perceptual experience), “materiality of modes”(“the play of language and image”) and “the motivated sign”(the relationship between signs, sign maker, sign making and social context), has the potential to inspire “new curricula of communication” and generate new learning possibilities within e-learning environments (Fleckenstein, Calendrillo, & Worley, 2002, p. 5; Kress, 2000, p.159).

Along similar lines, the New London Group (1996) argued that the meaning of literacy is represented in many different forms according to its cultural and linguistic context and that a narrow definition of literacy, fails to accommodate this diversity. Thus, a pedagogy of multiliteracies recognizes the need to develop a broader definition of literacy that views language as, “revisionary, creative, personal and pluralistic in nature” (Loveless et al., 2001, p. 74). The different forms of communication created by new technologies also need to be considered when teaching literacy. While a pedagogy of multiliteracies “supplements traditional literacy pedagogy”, it also reviews “the multiplicity of communication channels and media” and “increasing salience of cultural and linguistic diversity” by examining different modes of meaning used by individuals to communicate knowledge (Cope & Kalantzis, 2000, pp. 5 & 29).

1.3.Modes of Meaning

Modes of meaning can be conceptualized as visual, aural, gestural, spatial and linguistic elements of design that can be used in multimodal communications. Table 1 (adapted from Cope & Kalantzis, 2000) identifies these elements of design. A pedagogy of multiliteracies is based on the idea that to “find our way around mass media, multimedia and el ectronic hypermedia” and accommodate “the realities of increasing local diversity

254 Hesterman, S.

and global connectedness”, a new multimodal literacy definition is required (Cope &

Kalantzis, 2000, p. 6). The epistemology underpinning this pedagogy is consistent with

constructivist interpretive post-modern theoretical perspectives that view language as “relativist in stance” and knowledge as “relative to time and space” (Patton, 2002, p. 100).

Consequently, language and knowledge constructs are subject to individual interpretation at a given point in time and modes of meaning can be varied according to the designer’s communication purpose.

Technological innovations have now generated what is described as “knowledge bazaar” (Hsu, 2009), where on-line knowledge is now freely accessible, and open to varied interpretation and change by participants with different life experiences and alternative world views. In the context of e-learning, a pedagogy of multiliteracies, multimodal theory, and multiple modes of meaning, all expand humanity’s meaning-making enterprise, which is the generation of knowledge.

Table 1: Multiliteracies Modes of Meaning

1.4.E-Learning

Electronic learning (e-learning) is defined as “the use of new multimedia technologies

and the Internet to improve the quality of learning by facilitating access to resources and services as well as remote exchanges and collaboration” (European Commission, 2001). This definit ion “builds upon the tenet that learning is a social process and that e-learning is only a tool, albeit a valuable one, to be used in context with appropriate pedagogical

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 255 practices” (Holmes, 2006, p. 22). Since the 1990s, there has been a proliferation of case study research that documents the capacity of e-learning to leverage “knowledge production, innovation and competitive edge” (Lee, 2005, p. 4). These terms, traditionally associated with business enterprise, now dominate government education policy initiatives and can impact on ECE learning goals:

…we live in a dynamic and rapidly changing world that is driven by forces of competition. There is therefore, an ever growing need to check that knowledge and skill sets that we each have are both relevant to the “time frame” in which we each exist and are appropriate to the jobs and tasks that we have to perform…in principle, we can therefore avoid the confusion, chaos and disaster associated with “not knowing” (Barker, 2005, p. 112).

In the field of educatio n, however, the condition of “not knowing” is not necessarily associated with circumstances of confusion, chaos and disaster. The adage, “as the radius of knowledge extends, the circumference of ignorance expands” is particularly pertinent when considering, “Children starting school this year will be retiring in 2070”, and as Robinson (2009) aptly reminded, “No one has any idea of what the world will look like in ten years’ time, let alone in 2070” (p. 17). Thus, preparing students for future challenges, it would seem, involves their preparation for multiple ways of knowing. Chalofsky (2005) observed, “In the knowledge era…there are not only multiple ways of viewing reality, but also multiple ways of knowing (learning). Diversity is a stimulant to learning because it forces us to confront different perspectives” (p. 55).

Since the advent of Web 2.0, Australian children are increasingly experiencing new ways of thinking and knowing. Today, ECE teachers are asked to reflect critically on their current practice to consider ways of integrating ICT in their program, and to provide an e-learning environment that inspires emotions of excitement, energy and enthusiasm (Luskin, 2008; Masters, 2004; Yelland & Masters, 2007).The following e-learning resources can enrich multiliteracies experiences in the early years: live broadcasts, mobile, video and audio telecommunications, two- and three-dimensional electronic graphics, email, and the Web (adapted from Holmes & Gardner, 2006). The challenge for teachers is to determine: how best to integrate these e-learning resources in their program; and identify knowledge management strategies that best support knowledge generation. 1.5.Knowledge Management

In their book, Appreciative Inquiry and Knowledge Management: A Social Constructivist Perspective, Thatchenkery, and Chowdhry (2007) presented a knowledge management (KM) model relevant to the early years. The authors discussed the need for a paradigm shift from knowledge management akin to the banking model, where knowledge is a gift bestowed to the masses by a privileged few, to a model that focuses on knowledge-sharing among a community of learners. The authors’ understandings were consistent with ECE pedagogical considerations of wanting students to willingly share knowledge derived from lived experiences for the purpose of scaffolding the acquisition of new knowledge. Thatchenkery and Chowdhry (2007) noted, “Since knowledge resides mostly in people’s heads, managing it is inherently problematic …the challenge then is figuring out how to create a knowledge sharing culture” (pp. 1 & 2).

In ECE, if the individual child is not viewed tabula rasa, an empty vessel to be filled with knowledge, then attention focuses on how teachers can utilize students’ acquired knowledge and cultural resources amassed from lived experiences to extend their learning (Harrison, 2005; Pahl & Rowsell, 2005; Rowsell, 2006). Identified in the literature are three sources of knowledge that can be used to achieve this purpose:

256 Hesterman, S.

1.Students’ own innate knowledge…mental models, rules, scripts, plans…thei r

private knowledge;

2.Knowledge embedded in an electronic performance support system (emails, the

Internet); and

3.The global pool of shared (possibly “public”) knowledge that is available to the

student as a result of various knowledge-sharing processes (adapted from Barker, 2005, pp. 114 & 115).

Communication is an essential component of building knowledge. Whether speaking during class discussions, talking on the telephone, conversing by email, or accessing electronic archives, multiple opportunities to scaffold and generate knowledge are presented. A critical consideration for ECE teachers is how best to support knowledge-sharing processes so that students can build on their “private” knowledge.

In the field of corporate business, knowledge is considered a commodity and knowledge management, “a conscious strategy of getting the right knowledge to the right people at the right time” (O’Dell & Grayson, 1998, p.6). Information and communication

technologies are recogni zed “as a source of innovation”, that can maximize opportunities

for “knowledge creation, transfer and sharing” in all “key areas of the economy” including education (Bell De Tienne, Dyer, Hoopes, & Harris, 2004, p. 26; Coonan, 2005, p. 5). There is research, however, that shows that knowledge management involves more than the use of ICT. Kluge, Stein, and Licht (2001) have observed:

To draw the greatest benefits from a knowledge management program and to

match best practice, you must enthuse your employees with a desire for

knowledge. If a knowledge management measure is to fall on fertile

ground…every individual needs to be thirsty for knowledge (p. 25).

If the preceding text is examined through educators’ lens, analogies can be made.

To draw the greatest benefits from knowledge management, and match best practice in ECE, teachers need to engender a desire for learning. Young children are known to have

a “natural curiosity and eagerness to learn”, and therefore, it is incumbent upon teachers

to provide an environment where students feel inclined to share their knowledge with class peers (Briggs & Potter, 1999, p. 379). Also significant is how teachers integrate ICT

in student learning to support knowledge creation, transfer and sharing in this digital age.

As evidenced in The Willy Wagtail Tale, a personal approach to knowledge management, one that focused on humanitarian aspects such as “building confidence and trust”, and establishing a collaborative learning environment, where students’ knowledge contribut ions were “openly accepted”, were at the very core of effective knowledge management in the early years (Schwarzwalder, 1999, p. 64).

1.6.Multiliteracies, E-learning and Knowledge Management in the Early

Years

Multiliteracies, e-learning and knowledge management are recognized as powerful mediums in their own right, that can bridge classroom learning to out of school lived experiences in “new and dynamic ways” (Yelland, 2001, p. 3; Yelland, Lee, O’Rourke, & Harrison, 2008). When these three processes are integrally entwined with constructivist learning theory, however, early years’ learning can be enhanced dramatically. Pedagogical considerations include designing an authentic learning environment that accommodates individual student’s interests, inspires creat ive meaning-making designs, promotes cultural and linguistic diversity and broadens literacy definition.

The reader is reminded that ECE has a “long and dynamic history” that has emphasized young students’ need for flexible learning environments, the imp ortance of

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 257 play and imagination, and respect for their individual dispositions (Briggs & Potter, 1999, p. 10). As evidenced in The Willy Wagtail Tale, these enlightenment traditions are revitalized when multiliteracies experiences, e-learning and knowledge management are grounded in a social constructivist conceptual framework.

2.Research Setting: Bridgewater Community School

As previously stated, this research was documented in a small Western Australian independent school, now referred to as Bridgewater Community School. Teachers were committed to implementing the Reggio Emilia teaching approach. The school community, while not familiar with multiliteracies conceptual framework, recognized that children learn and communicate in a myriad of “multileveled and multimodal ways” by means of

The Hundred Languages of Children (Spaggiari & Rinaldi, 1996, p. 13).

The term The Hundred Languages of Children is synonymous with the Reggio Emilia teaching approach. It provides a title to an exhibit, a book, a poem, a metaphor, a pedagogy, a theory and a philosophy (Edwards, Gandini, & Forman, 1998). Each of these forms provides insight to educational principles that underpin this teaching approach. Malaguzzi (1986) who first inspired the idea of The Hundred Languages of Children, aimed to “make visible” the “culture of childhood” through “exchange, reflection and discussion” on early years experiences (Rinaldi, 1998, p. 122; Rinaldi, 2006, p. 59).

To promote The Hundred Languages of Children at Bridgewater Community School (CS), class meetings were held throughout the day, when members listened and were responsive to each other’s interests and ideas. The classroom teacher documented meeting dialogue which could extend to thirty minutes, identified knowledge generation, an d introduced provocations to further stimulate students’ thought. Children were then encouraged, to “take leadership in planning” a child-initiated project that extended their interests and ideas (Katz, 1998, p. 33). They were also encouraged to assume “responsibilities” for their own learning (Edwards et al., 1998, p. 359). To facilitate students’ self expression, the teacher ensured that children had ready access to a diverse range of open-ended resources that could be used to communicate their knowledge and understandings, and explore further their developing theories.

Teachers adopting the Reggio Emilia teaching approach recognize children as “unique individuals with rights”, who are “rich in resources, strong and competent” (Rinaldi, 1998, p. 114). Desc ribed as “a new paradigm for the sociology of childhood”, young students are perceived as “authors and inventors”, “who know how to walk along the path of understanding”, and who are “protagonists of their own growth” (Malaguzzi, 1998, pp. 67 & 180; Nimmo, 1998, p. 306). Reflective pedagogy is considered critical to teachers’ successful implementation of the Reggio Emilia teaching approach.

At Bridgewater CS, there was also a high level of school community interest and commitment to integrating ICT in stud ents’ learning. An Information Technology (IT) specialist was employed to support teachers and students’ interest in integrating ICT in class projects. The school’s budget also provided generous funding to provide a diverse range of quality ICT resources for class use. Consequently, information and communication technologies were not considered “precious” resources. They were freely accessed by students in the same manner as other regular classroom resources, such as adhesive tape and colored pencils. ICT were tools to be used when they served a purpose.

The Willy Wagtail Tale documented a pre-primary class project over a four month period and employed ethnographic methodology. Participant observations, semi

258

Hesterman, S.

structured interviews, and document and video analysis were methods used to retell this amazing tale. Class members included 17 students aged between five and six years, an early childhood teacher (pseudonym Whitney) and one teacher assistant. The involvement of a Bridgewater CS IT specialist (pseudonym Jon) in the class project was also recorded. In this early years’ setting there were multiple opportunities for students’ hands on experiences to design personal meaning and express cultural and linguistic diversity using a wide range of resources. Throughout the school year, ICT was used to enrich students’ multiliteracies experiences, during short and long -term child-initiated, teacher facilitated, and open-ended project investigations.

2.1. Case Study Vignette: The Willy Wagtail Tale

In August 2005, Whitn ey’s students pulled chairs into an enclosed patio area adjacent to their classroom for a morning meeting. The patio area could be viewed through a large classroom window. During the previous week, much to everyone’s surprise and delight two willy wagtails commenced flying through the patio area, their loud communications interrupting conversation. The children listened and imitated the birds’ aural designs, their whistling, chirping, and singing. They compared these sounds to other bird noises they had heard when visiting the parkland lake near their school.

One student suggested to the class that they suspend a branch from the patio eaves so the birds had a place to rest. Others agreed this was a good idea and Whitney facilitated the design process. The next day, two students decided the birds might like ready-made nests. They decorated two small plastic containers and asked Whitney to attach these to the branch. Another teacher walking by, called out, “Don’t be silly. They [the birds] won’t come!”

After the weekend, the class returned to school to discover, as if by magic, two birds building a nest on the suspended branch (Figure 1). Students offered the birds some blue woolen threads as decorative nesting material. The wind blew the wool under a chair and

it was soon forgotten.

Figure 1. Willy Wagtails under the Patio Eaves

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4.

259

To support students’ interest in the birds, Whitney recorded the nest building by positioning a video camera high on a stack of milk crates, leveled at nest height. Children now focuse d their attention on the birds’ gestures and flight patterns hoping to discover where the birds ventured after leaving the patio area. Viewing the video images on a laptop, the class observed the birds’ faces masked with cobwebs and noted the skilful smearing motions used to create a neat cup-shaped nest. One week and many hours of video footage later the nest was completed and the birds took turns to sit. Students had many questions. They wondered what the nest is made of, how many eggs there might be, whi ch bird was the “mum” or “dad”. The children wanted to climb high and see what was in the nest.

Whitney decided to suspend an Isight camera from the eaves just above the nest. The IT specialist, Jon, provided the necessary equipment. Whitney linked the camera connection to her laptop that was inside the classroom. There was immense class excitement as three eggs were viewed along with the blue wool woven into the nest lining. Outside in the patio area, the children observed the birds’ activities and the ne st from different perspectives, side profile and beneath (Figure 2). Inside the classroom, they observed nest features from an aerial perspective. The children discussed differences

in visual, spatial and gestural designs.

Figure 2. Aerial Perspective of the Nest

They also learned that if they stood directly beneath the nest an aerial view of their body was also captured on video and viewed on the laptop screen. Peers inside the classroom called out enthusiastically through the large window, “We can see you!” Students took turns performing different gestural designs under the nest to be captured on video or stayed inside the classroom viewing the computer screen to provide peer feedback. They eagerly tallied the number of times the adults sat on the eggs.

A parent contacted The Western Australian newspaper and a reporter visited the school. Children theorized how they would become rich and famous. Due to the publicity, the school was contacted by bird enthusiasts in the wider community who were interested t o learn the latest “bird news”.

With the help from another parent, a webcam was connected to Whitney’s laptop so the birds could be viewed by others on the Intranet and Internet (Figures 2-4). Children enquired about the nest-building materials. The school community soon accessed the

260

Hesterman, S.

World Wide Web. Information and clarification was sought from local ornithologists by

email.

Figure 3. Nest Activities Communications via the Intranet and Internet

Figure 4. Video Image of Adult Birds Feeding Hatchlings

Children spontaneously drew visual designs of nest images and theorized about the birds ’ appearance inside the eggs. To support this process, Whitney provided her students with a black and white digital image of the eggs and encouraged them to superimpose their visual design onto paper (Figure 5). One-week later, one egg disappeared from the nest and children theorized where it had gone. The students learned from the wider community that the cup shaped nest was constructed from beak smeared spider webs and that it was near impossible to distinguish a male from a female willy wagtail.

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4.

261

“The babies are fluffy and black and white like their Mummy and Daddy.”

“Their wings are closed up while their whole bodies are getting made. They get food and water from special pipes inside the egg.”

Figure 5. Students Theories and D raw “Baby Birds ’” Appearance inside the Eggs The next day the other two eggs hatched. Students observed the adult birds feeding their young, the hatchlings’ diet and the dramatic change in bir d appearance. Class meetings focused on how the “baby birds” had the same needs as children: care, food, and shelter. Children theorized how the images from the laptop were transported to other computers (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Students Theories How Screen Images Travel between Computers To further extend children’s interest in the birds’ activities, Whitney linked her laptop to a data projector. Birds and nest images were then displayed onto a white classroom wall. The children observed and then initiated gestures imitating bird movement. They designed play scripts with the intention of presenting a bird show to others. They talked to the bird images on the wall, stroked their projected bodies and patted the egg shapes. After the eggs hatched, the children role-played feeding the

262

Hesterman, S.

hatchlings and imitated their different calls. They interacted spontaneously through free play and initiated a wide range of visual, aural, gestural, spatial, linguistic and multimodal modes of meaning.

After the school holidays, the children returned to discover the fledglings had left the nest but were still flying close to the classroom. The children searched for the young birds’ new home and asked, “Do they have their own nest?” Connections with “leaving the nest” were made with students’ own life experiences, such as leaving the school at the end of the year, or selling the family home. A group of students sought natural materials to design their own bird nests then photographed these using a digital camera (Figures 7 and 8). Whitney advised students she knew someone else who did work like them and presented them with the visual designs, produced by British sculptor, photographer and

environmentalist, Andy Goldsworthy (1990).

Figure 7. Integrating ICT

Figures 8a & 8b: Digitalizing Nest Designs

As the end of the school year drew close, Whitney edited long lengths of video footage to produce a DVD student keepsake. She included her own reflections on this project experience:

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4.

263

A child’s dream became a reality as we watched with pl easure and wonderment as the birds built their nest and raised their young. It has been an amazing opportunity to document the life of the willy wagtails and has created opportunities to interconnect and build relationships throughout the school and the wider community.

The case study vignette of The Willy Wagtail Tale illustrated how Whitney integrated ICT to promote The Hundred Languages of Children and in so doing provided extensive opportunities to enrich multiliteracies experiences. This early year’s c lass project accommodated students’ interests and inspired creative designs employing visual, aural, gestural, spatial, linguistic, and multimodal modes of meaning. Whitney’s social constructivist knowledge management practices and provision of a child-centered e-learning environment were critical in supporting these processes.

2.2. Project Postscript

Whitney’s program design facilitated students’ active involvement in daily project investigations that emanated from their natural curiosity and eagerness to learn. In The Willy Wagtail Tale project, students’ interest in the birds continued until the end of the school year. During the following school year, numerous willy wagtails were seen perching in nearby trees (Figure 9) and occasionally they visited the classroom patio area to chirp morning greetings. The children shared the tale of the willy wagtails with new students. All hoped a second nest would be built.

As previously stated, The Willy Wagtail Tale presented an exemplar of ICT integration in the early years that supported multiliteracies experiences and included e-learning. The vignette also demonstrated how knowledge management enriched “constructive solution” to inquiry -based learning and promoted community “discourse, interactivity and communication ” far beyond the early year’s classroom (Almala, 2005, p.

10; Almala, 2006, p. 33).

Figure 9. Fledglings Remaining Close to the Classroom Patio Area

264 Hesterman, S.

3.Discussion

Perhaps the most powerful insight into Whitney’s knowledge management practices and e-learning considerations was provided when she described her pedagogy as fundamentally “social constructivist” and said that the Reggio Emilia teaching approach

to ECE provided the best example of its principles in action. The Reggio Emilia teaching

approach, shaped by the writings of Dewey, Montessori, Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner,

Gardner, and Malaguzzi, promotes social constructivist learning principles, “the idea that knowledge is socially constructed in a cultural setting” (Hill, Stremmel, & Fu, 2005, p. 7) and th at “there is no knowledge independent of the meaning attributed to experience (constructed) by the learner, or community of learners” (Hein, 1991, p. 1). These principles are integrated in curriculum design. Thus, rather than teacher pre-planned, it is “negotiated” through “emergent processes between adults and children” (Pope Edwards, 2002, p. 4). It is opportunities for negotiation through emergent curriculum that enable teachers and students to explore new literacies and use ICT to learn in new ways.

Whi tney stated that, at Bridgewater CS, the “social component” of social

constructivism occurred when class members learned how to form a group, listen carefully, challenge ideas, and scaffold one another’s learning within a group setting.

Whitney designed an ECE program that involved daily class meetings that provided a forum for children to ask questions about project investigations. Projects remained broad-based and open-ended to enable students to determine the direction and duration of their study. Class meetings occurred three times a day and could last up to an hour. Whitney commented, “These meetings give children opportunities to reflect on new understandings, to share problems, clarify thoughts, and to search for relationships, where theories are con structed, inconsistencies questioned, and theories repaired.” Clearly demonstrated in The Willy Wagtail Tale, were Whitney’s social constructivist knowledge management strategies. Students’ interests were accommodated and cultural and linguistic diversity was embraced. Both of these are essential prerequisites if multiliteracies experiences are to be enriched in the early years.

Whitney’s e-learning pedagogical considerations included adopting a broad ICT definition, and facilitating students’ daily access to ICT resources in response to their meaning-making design requests. She ensured that there was time, space and resources for students to share their ICT hands on experiences and multiliteracies expressions with interested others. Transforming Whitney’s pedagogical considerations into practice, however, was dependent on having a school community committed to providing students with extensive exposure to different modes of communication, namely The Hundred Languages of Children. At Bridgewater CS, the community shared a common bond to support the integration of ICT for the purpose of exploring diverse learning possibilities. ICT was used to share students’ discoveries, knowledge and understanding with members of the wider community.

During an interview, Wh itney explained that she was “passionate” about using computers, “loved” to experiment with their creative applications and “thrilled” when children were excited about their own ICT discoveries. Clearly, Whitney was highly motivated to provide a classroom environment that “engaged and empowered eLearners” (Donohue, Fox, & Torrence, 2007, p. 35). She reflected critically about how different resources, including ICT, could be used to support students’ individual symbolic representations of knowledge, as deriv ed from their life experiences. Whitney’s knowledge management practices were consistent with those of post-modern thinkers who believe that “truth, reality and knowledge are always changing and constructed by human beings in multiple forms” (Cannella, 1997, p. 13). Whitney’s program provided

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 265 extensive time and multiple opportunities for students’ hands-on play experiences to design personal meaning using a wide range of ICT resources.

4.Conclusion

The Willy Wagtail Tale relays a simple story, at its core, a teacher’s responsiveness to accommodate a student’s request to hang a branch under patio eaves for birds to rest. The amazing events that unfolded and the extensive multiliteracies experiences that were offered to students as a result, would not have occur red, except for the teacher’s commitment to support emergent curriculum, integrate ICT, and promote The Hundred Languages of Children. Pedagogical considerations that enriched multiliteracies experiences included how to provide opportunities for students’ e-learning and implement knowledge management strategies that extended students’ individual meaning-making designs.

During the four month project, community relationships were fostered, students’ interests were accommodated, creative designs were inspired, and cultural and linguistic diversity was empowered. Questions such as, “What will new literacies look like in an early years program?”, “How can ICT be used to learn in new ways?”, and “What pedagogies of multiliteracies are relevant for early childhoo d education?” were explored. Perhaps of most interest to early childhood teachers at the coalface of education reform, is that enriching early years’ multiliteracies experiences as depicted in The Willy Wagtail Tale, occurred inadvertently through social constructivist knowledge management and child-centered e-learning.

References

1Almala, A. H. (2005). A constructivist conceptual framework for a quality e-learning environment. Distance Learning, 2(5), 9-12.

2Almala, A. H. (2006). Applying the principles of constructivism to a quality e-learning environment. Distance Education, 3(1), 33-40.

3Barker, P. (2005). Knowledge management for e-learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 111-121.

4Bell De Tienne, K., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C., & Harris, S. (2004). Toward a model of effective knowledge management and directions for future research: Culture, leadership, and CKOs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 26-

44.

5Briggs, F., & Potter, G. (1999). The early years of school. Sydney: Longman.

6Cannella, G. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

7Chalofsky, N. (2005). Reshaping the way we view the world. ProQuest Educational Journal, 5(11), 54-58.

8Coonan, H. (2005). Address to the 2005 ICT outlook forum. Paper presented at the Creating Competitive Advantage from ICT, Sydney.

9Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacies learning and the design of social futures. South Yarra: Macmillan.

10Donohue, C., Fox, S., & Terrence, D. (2007). Early childhood educators as e-learners: Engaging approaches to teaching and learning. Young Children, July, 34-39.

266 Hesterman, S.

11Edwards, S., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children. Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

12European Commission. (2001). Communication to the Council and the European Parliament: The e-learning action plan, designing tomorrow’s education. In U.

Ehlers & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.

13Fleckenstein, K. S., Calendrillo, L. T., &Worley D. A. (Eds.). (2002) Language and image in the reading-writing classroom: Teaching vision. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

14Forman, G., & Fyle, B. (1998). Negotiated learning through design, documentation, and discourse. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach —Advanced reflections(pp.

239-250). Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

15Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

16Geekie, P., Cambourne, B., & Fitzsimmons, P. (1999). Understanding literacy development. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.

17Goldsworthy, A. (1990). Andy Goldsworthy. London: Penguin.

18Harrison, C. (2005). Young gifted children: Their search for complexity and connection. Exeter: INSCRIPT Publishing.

19Hein, G. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Paper presented at The Museum and the Needs of People, CECA Conference, Jerusalem, Israel.

20Hill, L. T., Stremmel, A. J., & Fu, V. R. (2005). Teaching as inquiry: Rethinking curriculum in early childhood education. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

21Holmes, B. (2006). Quality in a Europe of diverse systems and shared goals In U.

Ehlers & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin.

22Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning concepts and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

23Hsu, J. (2009). Innovative technologies for education and learning: Education and knowledge- orientated blogs, wikis, podcasts, and more. In E. J. Szewczak (Ed.), Selected readings on the human side of information technology (pp. 203-223). New York: Information Science Reference.

24Katz, L. G. (1998). What can we learn from Reggio Emilia? In S. Edwards, L.

Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach —Advanced reflections. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

25Kluge, J., Stein, W., & Licht, T. (2001). Knowledge unplugged: The McKinsey & Company global survey on knowledge management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

26Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.

27Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and design of social futures. South Yarra: Macmillan.

28Lee, A. (2005). Knowing our business: The role of education in the university.

Canberra: Australian Council of Deans of Education.

Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 1, No.4. 267 29Lee, L., Yelland, N., O’Rourke, M., &Harrison, C. (2003). A pedagogy for multiliteracies with information and communication technologies in early childhood education: Australian research grant application. Perth: Murdoch University.

30Loveless, A., DeVoogd, G., & Bohlin, R. (2001). Something old, something new...: Is pedagogy affected by ICT? In A. Loveless & V. Ellis (Eds.), ICT, pedagogy and the curriculum: Subject to change (pp. 63-83). London: Routledge Falmer.

31Luskin, B. (2008). Internet Media Solutions. Retrieved June 16, 2009, from Luskin International Web Site: https://www.sodocs.net/doc/0d9032086.html,/eng/e-learning.php 32Malaguzzi, L. (1986). The hundred languages of children: Catalogue of the exhibition. Reggio Emilia: Reggio Emilia Children.

33Malaguzzi, L. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach —Advanced reflections(pp. 49-97).

Greenwich: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

34Masters, J. (2004). Realising the potential of computers in the classroom: Teacher scaffolding strategies for supporting children working with computers.Paper presented at the Reform and Realise the Potential Conference, Adelaide, Australia: ACCE.

35New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.

Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-93.

36Nimmo, J. (1998). The child in community: Constraints from the early childhood lore. In S. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The Reggio Emilia approach: Advanced reflections (pp. 295-312). London: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

37O’Dell, C., & Grayson, C. J. Jr. (1998). If we only knew what we know: The transfer of internal knowledge and best practice. New York: The Free Press.

38O'Rourke, M. (2005). Multiliteracies for 21st century schools. In ANSN (Ed.), Snapshot. Lindfield, NSW: The Australian National Schools Network Ltd.

39Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

40Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.

41Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods(3rd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

42Pope Edwards, C. (2002). Three approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori and ReggioEmilia. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 4(1).

43Rinaldi, C. (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation - progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G.

Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach —Advanced reflections. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

44Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia. New York: Routledge.

45Robinson, K. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything.

Maryborough, Victoria: Allen Lane.

46Rowsell, J. (2006). Family literacy experiences: Creating reading and writing opportunities that support classroom learning. Markham, Ontario: Pembroke.

47Schwarzwalder, R. (1999). Librarians as knowledge management agents. EContent, 2(4), 63-65.

268 Hesterman, S.

48Spaggiari, S., & Rinaldi, C. (1996). I centro linguaggi dei bambini: Narrativa del possible. Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.

49Thatchenkery, T., & Chowdhry, D. (2007) Appreciative inquiry and knowledge management: A social constructivist perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

50Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

51Yelland, N. (2001). Teaching and learning with information and communication technologies (ICT) for numeracy in the early childhood and primary years of schooling: A Report prepared for: Research and Evaluation Branch, International Analysis and Evaluation Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

52Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age.

Computers and Education, 48(3), 362-382.

53Yelland, N., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M., & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking learning in early childhood. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

北师大版七年级数学下册三角形难题全解

的度数;

三角形强化训练和深化 ? 1、如图a 是长方形纸带,∠DEF=25°,将纸带沿EF 折叠成图b ,再沿BF 折叠成图c ,则图c 中的∠CFE 的度数是_________°. 解析: 由题意可知折叠前,由BC//AD 得: ∠BFE=∠DEF=25°将纸带沿EF 折叠成图b 后, ∠GEF=∠DEF=25° 所以图b 中,∠DGF=∠GEF+∠BFE=25°+25°=50° 又在四边形CDGF 中,∠C=∠D=90° 则由:∠DGF+∠GFC=180° 所以:∠GFC=180°-50°=130° 将纸带再沿BF 第二次折叠成图C 后 ∠GFC 角度值保持不变 且此时:∠GFC =∠EFG+∠CFE 所以:∠CFE=∠GFC-∠EFG=130°-25°=105 2、在Rt △ABC 中,∠A =90°,CE 是角平分线,和高AD 相交于F ,作FG ∥BC 交AB 于G ,求证:AE =BG . 解法1: 【解析】证明:∵∠BAC=900 AD ⊥BC ∴∠1= ∠B ∵CE 是角平分线 ∴∠2=∠3 ∵∠5=∠1+∠2 ∠4=∠3+∠B ∴∠4=∠5 ∴AE =AF

过F作FM⊥AC并延长MF交BC于N ∴MN//AB ∵FG//BD ∴四边形GBDF为平行四边形 ∴GB=FN ∵AD⊥BC,CE为角平分线 ∴FD=FM 在Rt△AMF和RtNDF中 ∴△AMF≌△NDF ∴AF=FN ∴AE=BG 解法2: 解:作EH⊥BC于H,如图, ∵E是角平分线上的点,EH⊥BC,EA⊥CA, ∴EA=EH, ∵AD为△ABC的高,EC平分∠ACD, ∴∠ADC=90°,∠ACE=∠ECB, ∴∠B=∠DAC, ∵∠AEC=∠B+∠ECB, ∴∠AEC=∠DAC+∠ECA=∠AFE, ∴AE=AF, ∴EG=AF, ∵FG∥BC, ∴∠AGF=∠B, ∵在△AFG和△EHB中, ∠GAF=∠BEH ∠AGF=∠B AF=EH ,∴△AFG≌△EHB(AAS) ∴AG=EB, 即AE+EG=BG+GE, ∴AE=BG. 3、如图,等腰直角三角形ABC中,∠ACB=90°,AD为腰CB上的中线,CE⊥AD交AB 于E.求证∠CDA=∠EDB.

web of science中文使用手册

Web of Science 中文使用手冊

目次 Welcome to the Web of Science (2) ISI Web of Knowledge介紹 (3) Cross Search 跨資料庫檢索 (4) 簡易Cross Search (4) 詳細Cross Search (4) 檢索結果 (6) ISI Web of Knowledge檢索結果 (6) 勾選清單 (7) 全記錄—以WOS為例 (7) External Collections 檢索結果 (8) WOK平台個人化功能 (9) Register註冊個人帳號 (9) Web of Science首頁 (11) 進入ISI Web of Knowledge (11) 進入Web of Science首頁 (12) 選擇資料庫和時間 (12) Quick Search快速查詢 (12) General Search (13) 檢索結果 (16) Full Record全記錄 (18) 引用文獻(Cited Reference) (19) 被引用文獻(Time Cited) (20) 共同引用記錄(Related Record) (21) Citation Alert (21) 檢索技巧 (23) 被引用參考文獻查詢(Cited Reference Search) (27) 進階檢索(Advanced Search) (30) 結構式查詢(Structure Search) (30) 檢索歷史 (32) Combine Sets結合檢索策略 (32) Save History儲存檢索歷史 (33) Open Saved History開啟已儲存檢索歷史 (34) 管理在ISI Web of Knowledge Server上的檢索歷史 (37) Mark List勾選清單 (38) 附錄一 (40) Contacting Us 聯絡我們 (40) 1

【免费下载】中学教材全解 七年级数学上北师大版期末检测题含答案

图2图图 期末检测题 【本检测题满分:120分,时间:120分钟】 一、选择题(每小题3分,共30分) 1.(2013?湖南张家界中考)-2 013的绝对值是( ) A.-2 013 B.2 013 C. D.12013 12013 -2.已知两数在数轴上的位置如图所示,则化简代数式,a b 的结果是( ) 12a b a b +--++A.1 B. C. D.-1 23b +23a -3.某商店把一件商品按标价的九折出售(即优惠10%),仍可获利20%,若该商品的标价为每件28元,则该商品的进价为( ) A.21元 B.19.8元 C.22.4元 D.25.2元 4.(2013?湖南株洲中考)一元一次方程的解是( ) 24x =A. B. C. D.1x =2x =3x =4 x =5.如图,,则与之比为( )11,,34 AC AB BD AB AE CD ===CE AB A.1∶6 B.1:8 C.1:12 D.1:16 6.如果∠1与∠2互补,∠2与∠3互余,则∠1与∠3的关系是( ) A.∠1=∠3 B.∠1=180°-∠3 C.∠1=90°+∠3 D.以上都不对 7.如图是某班学生参加课外兴趣小组的人数占总人数比 例的统计图,则参加人数最多的课外兴趣小组是( ) A.棋类组 B.演唱组 C.书法组 D.美术组 8.某中学开展“阳光体育活动”,九年级一班全体同学分别参加了巴 山舞、乒乓球、篮球三个项目的活动,陈老师统计了该班参加这三项活动的人数,并绘制了如图所示的条形统计图和扇形统计图.根据这两个统计图,可以知道该班参加乒乓A B C D E 第5题图 习题到位。在管设备进行调整使度内来确保机组

新人教版七年级下册数学知识点整理

最新版人教版七年级数学下册知识点 第五章相交线与平行线 一、知识网络结构 相交线 相交线垂线 同位角、内错角、同旁内角 平行线:在同一平面内,不相交的两条直线叫平行线 定义 : __________ __________ ________ 平行线及其判定判定 1:同位角相等,两直线平行 判定 2 平行线的判定:内错角相等,两直线平行 相交线与平行线判定 3:同旁内角互补,两直线平行 判定 4:平行于同一条直线的两直线平行 平行线的性质性质 1:两直线平行,同位角 性质 2:两直线平行,内错角 性质 3:两直线平行,同旁内 性质 4:平行于同一条直线 相等 相等 角互补 的两直线平行命题、定理 平移 二、知识要点 1、在同一平面内,两条直线的位置关系有两种:相交和平行,垂直是相交的一种特殊情况。 2、在同一平面内,不相交的两条直线叫平行线。如果两条直线只有一个公共点,称这两条直线相交;如果两条直线没有公共点,称这两条直线平行。 3、两条直线相交所构成的四个角中,有公共顶点且有一条公共边的两个角是邻补角。邻补角的性质:邻补角互补。如图 1 所示,与互为邻补角,与互为邻补角。+=180°;+ =180° ; + =180°;+ =180°。321 4 4、两条直线相交所构成的四个角中,一个角的两边分别是另一个角的两边的图 1反 向延长线,这样的两个角互为对顶角。对顶角的性质:对顶角相等。如图1

所示,与互为对顶角。=; =。 5、两条直线相交所成的角中,如果有一个是直角或90° 时,称这两条直线互相垂直, 其中一条叫做另一条的垂线。如图 2 所示,当= 90°时,⊥b。 a 垂线的性质:2 1 3 4 性质 1:过一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线垂直。 图 2 性质 2:连接直线外一点与直线上各点的所有线段中,垂线段最短。 性质 3:如图 2 所示,当 a⊥ b 时,==== 90°。点到直线的距离:直线外一点到这条直线的垂线段的长度叫点到直线的c距离。 6、同位角、内错角、同旁内角基本特征:21 3 46 a 75 8 ①在两条直线 ( 被截线 ) 的同一方,都在第三条直线 ( 截线 ) 的同一侧,这样 b 同位角。图 3 中,共有图 3 的两个角叫对同位角:与是同位角; 与是同位角;与是同位角;与是同位角。 ②在两条直线 ( 被截线 )之间,并且在第三条直线 ( 截线 ) 的两侧,这样的两个角叫内错角。图 3中,共有对内错角:与是内错角;与是内错角。 ③在两条直线 ( 被截线 ) 的之间,都在第三条直线 ( 截线 ) 的同一旁,这样的两个角叫同旁内角。图 3中,共有对同旁内角:与是同旁内角;与是同旁内角。 7、平行公理:经过直线外一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线平行。 平行公理的推论:如果两条直线都与第三条直线平行,那么这两条直线也互相 平行。c 2 3 1 4 6 5 平行线的性质:a78性质 1:两直线平行,同位角相等。如图 4 所示,如果 a∥ b,图4 b 则 =; =; =; =。

(完整版)七年级下册数学知识结构图

第五章知识结构如下图所示: 第六章知识结构 第七章知识结构框图如下:

(二)开展好课题学习 可以如下展开课题学习: (1)背景了解多边形覆盖平面问题来自实际. (2)实验发现有些多边形能覆盖平面,有些则不能. (3)分析讨论多边形能覆盖平面的基本条件,发现问题与多边形的内角大小有密切关系,运用多边形内角和公式对实验结果进行分析. (4)运用进行简单的镶嵌设计. 首先引入用地砖铺地,用瓷砖贴墙等问题情境,并把这些实际问题转化为数学问题:用一些不重叠摆放的多边形把平面的一部分完全覆盖.然后让学生通过实验探究一些多边形能否镶嵌成平面图案,并记下实验结果:

(1)用正三角形、正方形或正六边形可以镶嵌成一个平面图案(图1).用正五边形不能镶嵌成一个平面图案. (2)用正三角形与正方形可以镶嵌成一个平面图案.用正三角形与正六边形也可以镶嵌成一个平面图案. (3)用任意三角形可以镶嵌成一个平面图案, 用任意四边形可以镶嵌成一个平面图案(图2).

观察上述实验结果,得出多边形能镶嵌成一个平面图案需要满足的两个条件: (1)拼接在同一个点(例如图2中的点O)的各个角的和恰好等于360°(周角); (2)相邻的多边形有公共边(例如图2中的OA两侧的多边形有公共边OA). 运用上述结论解释实验结果,例如,三角形的内角和等于180°,在图2中,∠1+∠2+∠3=180°.因此,把6个全等的三角形适当地拼接在同一个点(如图2), 一定能使以这点为顶点的6个角的和恰好等于360°,并且使边长相等的两条边贴在一起.于是, 用三角形能镶嵌成一个平面图案.又如,由多边形内角和公式,可以得到五边形的内角和等于 (5-2)×180°=540°. 因此,正五边形的每个内角等于 540°÷5=108°, 360°不是108°的整数倍,也就是说用一些108°的角拼不成360°的角.因此,用正五边形不能镶嵌成一个平面图案. 最后,让学生进行简单的镶嵌设计,使所学内容得到巩固与运用.1.利用二(三)元一次方程组解决问题的基本过程 2.本章知识安排的前后顺序

WebofKnowledge平台定题服务功能使用简介

Web of Knowledge平台服务功能使用简介 ISI Web of Knowledge为读者提供了个性化服务和定题服务功能。个性化定制指用户可以在Web of Konwledge主页上注册并设置自己密码,然后每次登录后即可浏览自己订制主页,包括:保存检索策略、建立并编辑自己经常阅读期刊列表;浏览保存检索策略、及时了解一个定题服务是否有效及过期时间。 电子邮件定题服务可让用户方便地跟踪最新研究信息。新定题服务功能允许用户通过web of science中任一种检索途径(普通检索、引文检索、化学结构检索)创建定题服务服务策略,将检索策略保存并转化为用电子邮件通知定题服务。 如图,在Web of Knowledge主页右侧提供了个性化定制服务和定题服务管理功能,下面就这几项功能一一说明如下: 图一:web of knowledge主页 一、注册 点击“Register”超链接,进入注册页面。如图二:分别按要求填入您电子邮件地址,您选择密码以及您姓名。您可以选择自动登录或者普通方式进入您个性化服务管理功能。自动登录可以免除您每次登录Web of Knowledge平台时输入电子邮件地址和密码。该功能使用是cookie技术。如果使用公共计算机,最好选择普通登录方式。 在完成以上操作之后,点击“Submit Registration”完成整个注册过程。

图二:用户注册页面 二、登录 作为注册用户,您可以实现以下功能: ?自动登录到Web of Knowledge平台。 ?选择一个自己常用开始页面,每次登录后则自动进入该页面。 ?将检索策略保存到ISI Web of Knowledge服务器。 ?创建用户关注期刊列表以及期刊目次定题服务。 登录时,在web of knowledge主页右侧输入您电子邮件地址和密码,点击“Sign in”则可进入您个人定制信息服务管理页面。 三、个人信息管理和选择开始页面 点击“My Preferences”超链接,可以编辑个人信息和选择开始页面。 编辑个人信息: 点击“Edit my Information”超链接可以更新您联系信息,如电子邮件地址、密码及姓名。如图三。

七年级数学下册全部知识点归纳

第一章:整式的运算 单项式 式 多项式 同底数幂的乘法 幂的乘方 积的乘方 同底数幂的除法 零指数幂 负指数幂 整式的加减 单项式与单项式相乘 单项式与多项式相乘 整式的乘法 多项式与多项式相乘 整式运算 平方差公式 完全平方公式 单项式除以单项式 整式的除法 多项式除以单项式 一、单项式 1、都是数字与字母的乘积的代数式叫做单项式。 2、单项式的数字因数叫做单项式的系数。 3、单项式中所有字母的指数和叫做单项式的次数。 4、单独一个数或一个字母也是单项式。 5、只含有字母因式的单项式的系数是1或―1。 6、单独的一个数字是单项式,它的系数是它本身。 7、单独的一个非零常数的次数是0。 8、单项式中只能含有乘法或乘方运算,而不能含有加、减等其他运算。 9、单项式的系数包括它前面的符号。 10、单项式的系数是带分数时,应化成假分数。 11、单项式的系数是1或―1时,通常省略数字“1”。 12、单项式的次数仅与字母有关,与单项式的系数无关。 二、多项式 1、几个单项式的和叫做多项式。 2、多项式中的每一个单项式叫做多项式的项。 3、多项式中不含字母的项叫做常数项。 4、一个多项式有几项,就叫做几项式。 5、多项式的每一项都包括项前面的符号。 6、多项式没有系数的概念,但有次数的概念。 7、多项式中次数最高的项的次数,叫做这个多项式的次数。 三、整式 1、单项式和多项式统称为整式。 2、单项式或多项式都是整式。 3、整式不一定是单项式。 4、整式不一定是多项式。

5、分母中含有字母的代数式不是整式;而是今后将要学习的分式。 四、整式的加减 1、整式加减的理论根据是:去括号法则,合并同类项法则,以及乘法分配率。 2、几个整式相加减,关键是正确地运用去括号法则,然后准确合并同类项。 3、几个整式相加减的一般步骤: (1)列出代数式:用括号把每个整式括起来,再用加减号连接。 (2)按去括号法则去括号。 (3)合并同类项。 4、代数式求值的一般步骤: (1)代数式化简。 (2)代入计算 (3)对于某些特殊的代数式,可采用“整体代入”进行计算。 五、同底数幂的乘法 1、n个相同因式(或因数)a相乘,记作a n,读作a的n次方(幂),其中a为底数,n为指数,a n的结果叫做幂。 2、底数相同的幂叫做同底数幂。 3、同底数幂乘法的运算法则:同底数幂相乘,底数不变,指数相加。即:a m﹒a n=a m+n。 4、此法则也可以逆用,即:a m+n = a m﹒a n。 5、开始底数不相同的幂的乘法,如果可以化成底数相同的幂的乘法,先化成同底数幂再运用法则。 六、幂的乘方 1、幂的乘方是指几个相同的幂相乘。(a m)n表示n个a m相乘。 2、幂的乘方运算法则:幂的乘方,底数不变,指数相乘。(a m)n =a mn。 3、此法则也可以逆用,即:a mn =(a m)n=(a n)m。 七、积的乘方 1、积的乘方是指底数是乘积形式的乘方。 2、积的乘方运算法则:积的乘方,等于把积中的每个因式分别乘方,然后把所得的幂相乘。即(ab)n=a n b n。 3、此法则也可以逆用,即:a n b n =(ab)n。 八、三种“幂的运算法则”异同点 1、共同点: (1)法则中的底数不变,只对指数做运算。 (2)法则中的底数(不为零)和指数具有普遍性,即可以是数,也可以是式(单项式或多项式)。 (3)对于含有3个或3个以上的运算,法则仍然成立。 2、不同点: (1)同底数幂相乘是指数相加。 (2)幂的乘方是指数相乘。 (3)积的乘方是每个因式分别乘方,再将结果相乘。 九、同底数幂的除法

(完整word版)北师大版七年级数学下册三角形难题全解

来源:2011-2012学年广东省汕头市潮南区中考模拟考试数学卷(解析版) 考点:三角形 如图,已知,等腰Rt△OAB中,∠AOB=90o,等腰Rt△EOF中,∠EOF=90o,连结AE、BF. 求证:(1)AE=BF;(2)AE⊥BF. 【答案】 见解析 【解析】解:(1)证明:在△AEO与△BFO中, ∵Rt△OAB与Rt△EOF等腰直角三角形, ∴AO=OB,OE=OF,∠AOE=90o-∠BOE=∠BOF, ∴△AEO≌△BFO, ∴AE=BF; ( 2)延长AE交BF于D,交OB于C,则∠BCD=∠ACO, 由(1)知:∠OAC=∠OBF, ∴∠BDA=∠AOB=90o, ∴AE⊥BF. (1)可以把要证明相等的线段AE,CF放到△AEO,△BFO中考虑全等的条件,由两个等腰直角三角形得AO=BO,OE=OF,再找夹角相等,这两个夹角都是直角

减去∠BOE的结果,所以相等,由此可以证明△AEO≌△BFO; (2)由(1)知:∠OAC=∠OBF,∴∠BDA=∠AOB=90°,由此可以证明AE⊥BF 来源:2012-2013学年吉林省八年级上期中考试数学试卷(解析版) 考点:四边形 如图,在正方形ABCD中,E是AD的中点,F是BA延长线上的一点,AF=AB,已知△ABE≌△ADF. (1)在图中,可以通过平移、翻折、旋转中哪一种方法,使△ABE变到△ADF 的位置; (2)线段BE与DF有什么关系?证明你的结论. 【答案】 (1)绕点A旋转90°;(2)BE=DF,BE⊥DF. 【解析】本题考查的是旋转的性质,全等三角形的判断和性质 (1)根据旋转的概念得出; (2)根据旋转的性质得出△ABE≌△ADF,从而得出BE=DF,再根据正方形的性质得出BE⊥DF. (1)图中是通过绕点A旋转90°,使△ABE变到△ADF的位置. (2)BE=DF,BE⊥DF; 延长BE交DF于G;

七年级下册初中数学知识点总结

七年级下册初中数学知识点总结 第一章 整式的运算 一. 整式 ※1. 单项式 ①由数与字母的积组成的代数式叫做单项式。单独一个数或 字母也是单项式。 ②单项式的系数是这个单项式的数字因数,作为单项式的系数,必须连同数字前面的性质符号,如果一个单项式只是字母的积,并非没有系数. ③一个单项式中,所有字母的指数和叫做这个单项式的次数. ※2.多项式 ①几个单项式的和叫做多项式.在多项式中,每个单项式叫做多 项式的项.其中,不含字母的项叫做常数项.一个多项式中,次 数最高项的次数,叫做这个多项式的次数. ②单项式和多项式都有次数,含有字母的单项式有系数,多项式 没有系数.多项式的每一项都是单项式,一个多项式的项数就 是这个多项式作为加数的单项式的个数.多项式中每一项都有 它们各自的次数,但是它们的次数不可能都作是为这个多项式 的次数,一个多项式的次数只有一个,它是所含各项的次数中 最高的那一项次数. ※3.整式单项式和多项式统称为整式. ????????其他代数式多项式单项式整式代数式 二. 整式的加减 ¤1. 整式的加减实质上就是去括号后,合并同类项,运算结果是一个多项式或是单项式. ¤2. 括号前面是“-”号,去括号时,括号内各项要变号,一个 数与多项式相乘时,这个数与括号内各项都要相乘. 三. 同底数幂的乘法 ※同底数幂的乘法法则: n m n m a a a +=?(都是正数)是幂的运算中最 基本的法则,在应用法则运算时,要注意以下几点: ①法则使用的前提条件是:幂的底数相同而且是相乘时,底数a 可以是一个具体的数字式字母,也可以是一个单项或多项式; ②指数是1时,不要误以为没有指数; ③不要将同底数幂的乘法与整式的加法相混淆,对乘法,只要底

苏科版数学七年级下册-配套中学教材全解(北京课.doc

2014-2015学年度配套中学教材全解七年级数学(下)(北京课改版) 期末检测题附答案详解 (本检测题满分:120分,时间:120分钟) 一、选择题(每小题3分,共36分) 1.若不等式组 12 x x m ì ?? , 有解,则m的取值范围是() A.m<2 B.m≥2 C.m<1 D.1≤m<2 2.(2014?南充中考)不等式组 () 1 12, 2 331 x x x ì? ?+? ?í ?? -<+ ?? 的解集在数轴上表示正确的是() A.B.C.D. 3.若方程组 2313, 3530.9 a b a b ì- ?? í? + ?? = = 的解是 8.3, 1.2, a b ì?? í? ?? = = 则方程组 ()() ()() 223113, 325130.9 x y x y ì+-- ?? í? ++- ?? = = 的解是() A. 6.3, 2.2 x y ì?? í? ?? = = B. .3, .2 x y ì?? í? ?? =8 =1 C. 10.3, 2.2 x y ì?? í? ?? = = D. 10.3, 0.2 x y ì?? í? ?? = = 4.下列语句:①一条直线有且只有一条垂线;②不相等的两个角一定不是对顶角;③两条不相交的直线叫做平行线;④若两个角的一对边在同一直线上,另一对边互相平行,则这两个角相等;⑤不在同一直线上的四个点可画6条直线;⑥如果两个角是邻补角,那么这两个角的平分线组成的图形是直角.其中错误的有() A.2个 B.3个 C.4个 D.5个 5.某中学课外科技小组的同学们设计制作了一个电动智能玩具,玩具中的四个动物小鱼、小羊、燕子和熊猫分别在1、2、3、4号位置上(如图),玩具的程序是:让四个动物按图中所示的规律变换位置,第一次上、下两排交换位置;第二次是在第一次换位后,再左、右两列交换位置;第三次再上、下两排交换位置;第四次再左、右两列交换位置;按这种规律,一直交换下去,那么第2 008次交换位置后,熊猫所在位置的号码是() A.1号 B.2号 C.3号 D.4号 6.如图,直线a和直线b被直线c所截,给出下列条件: 第5题图

天津新人教五四制数学七年级下册同步全解

第十四章实数 (2) 第一节平方根 (2) 第二节立方根 (6) 第三节实数 (8) 中考链接 (11) 单元检测 (12) 第十五章不等式与不等式组 (15) 第一节不等式 (15) 第二节实际问题与一元一次不等式 (17) 第三节一元一次不等式组 (19) 中考链接 (21) 单元检测 (23) 第十六章数据的分析 (26) 第一节数据的代表 (26) 第二节数据的波动 (29) 中考链接 (31) 单元检测 (33) 第十七章三角形 (37) 第一节与三角形有关的线段 (37) 第二节与三角形有关的角 (40) 第三节多边形及其内角和 (44) 中考链接 (47) 单元检测 (49) 第十八章全等三角形 (52) 第一节全等三角形 (52) 第二节三角形全等的条件 (55) 第三节角的平分线的性质 (59) 中考链接 (65) 单元检测 (68) 期中试卷 (72) 期末试卷 (75) 参考答案 (78)

第十四章实数 单元目标 1. 理解平方根、立方根的概念和性质; 2. 掌握算术平方根,算术平方根的非负性的应用. 3. 理解无理数和实数的概念以及有理数和无理数的区别; 4. 掌握实数和数轴上的点的关系,平面直角坐标系中的点和有序实数对之间的关系. 第一节平方根 要点精讲 1、算术平方根 一般地,如果一个正数x的平方等于a,即x2=a,那么这个正数x叫做a的算术平方根. a的算术平方根记为,读作“根号a”,a叫被开方数. 0的算术平方根是0. 2、用计算器求一个数的算术平方根 有的计算器上有“”键,就可以使用这个键直接求出一个数的算术平方根. 3、平方根 一般地,如果一个数的平方等于a,那么这个数叫做a的平方根(或二次方根),这就是说:如果x2=a,那么x叫做a的平方根. 4、开平方 求一个数a的平方根的运算,叫做开平方. 5、平方根的性质 正数有两个平方根,它们互为相反数; 0的平方根是0; 负数没有平方根. 6、平方根的表示 正数a的算术平方根用表示; 正数a的负的平方根用表示; 正数a的平方根用符号表示. 7、平方根重要性质: (1)a≥0时,;

ISI Web of Knowledge使用技巧

应用技巧一:如何了解您的论文被SCI收录的情况? 1.访问Web of Science数据库检索论文 请访问:https://www.sodocs.net/doc/0d9032086.html,,进入ISI Web of Knowledge平台;选择Web of Science数据库,(以下图示为WOK4.0版新界面)。 示例:如果我们希望检索“中国科技大学” “侯建国”院士在Science Citation Index (SCI)中收录文章的情况。 2.检索结果及输出 检索结果告诉我们找到了152篇“侯建国”院士的文章。(如果有重名的现象,请参考我们随后提供的有关作者甄别工具的应用技巧。)

我们可以选择先做Mark标记所有相关文章,再选择打印输出的方式,见下图: 下图是可打印的检索到的152篇侯建国院士所发表文章被SCI收录的记录。 结论:通过在Web of Science中用作者、及机构名称或地址的限制,检索到某一作者的文章,并做Mark标记后,选择打印输出,就可以了解您的论文被SCI收录的情况了。 应用技巧二:如何了解国际上都有哪些科学家在关注您的课题? 通过Web of Science的引文跟踪服务(Citation Alerts),您可以及时地跟踪您的一篇论文被新发表论文引用的情况,从而了解国际上都有哪些人在关注您的研究工作,他们为什么要引用您的论文,是否在您的课题基础上做了新的改进,是否对您的假说或理论提出了事实证据,是否指出了您研究工作的不足,他论文中的工作展望是否对您的下一步工作有借鉴意义,引文跟踪服务会直接将跟踪结果发到您的邮箱中。 1、注册个人帐号 为了让Web of Science知道您的邮箱地址,在做引文跟踪之前,首先要用您已有的e-mail邮箱在ISI Web of Knowledge中进行注册,注册方式如下:

七年级下册数学知识点整理

七年级数学《知识点》总结2019.12.27 相交线与平行线 一、知识网络结构 垂线的性质: 性质1:过一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线垂直。 性质2:连接直线外一点与直线上各点的所有线段中,垂线段最短。 性质3:如图2所示,当 a ⊥ b 时, = = = = 90°。 点到直线的距离:直线外一点到这条直线的垂线段的长度叫点到直线的距离。 同位角、内错角、同旁内角基本特征: 平行公理:经过直线外一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线平行。 平行公理的推论:如果两条直线都与第三条直线平行,那么这两条直线也互相平行。 ???? ? ?????? ??????????? ? ??? ?????? ??????????? ??????????????????平移 命题、定理 的两直线平行:平行于同一条直线性质角互补 :两直线平行,同旁内性质相等:两直线平行,内错角性质相等:两直线平行,同位角性质平行线的性质的两直线平行 :平行于同一条直线判定直线平行 :同旁内角互补,两判定线平行 :内错角相等,两直判定线平行 :同位角相等,两直判定定义平行线的判定平行线,不相交的两条直线叫平行线:在同一平面内平行线及其判定内角同位角、内错角、同旁垂线 相交线相交线相交线与平行线 4321 4321____________________________:图2 1 3 4 2 a b a 5 7 8 6 1 3 4 2 b c

平行线的性质: 10、平移:在平面内,将一个图形沿某个方向移动一定的距离,图形的这种移动叫做平移变换,简称平移。 平移后,新图形与原图形的形状和大小完全相同。平移后得到的新图形中每一点,都是由原图形中的某一点移动后得到的,这样的两个点叫做对应点。平移性质:平移前后两个图形中①对应点的连线平行且相等;②对应线段相等; ③对应角相等。 实数 实数的分类 1、按定义分类: 2.按性质符号分类: 注:0既不是正数也不是负数. 【知识点二】实数的相关概念 1.相反数 (1)代数意义:只有符号不同的两个数,我们说其中一个是另一个的相反数.0的相反数是0. (2)几何意义:在数轴上原点的两侧,与原点距离相等的两个点表示的两个数互为相反数,或数轴上,互为相反数的两个数所对应的点关于原点对称. (3)互为相反数的两个数之和等于0.a、b互为相反数 a+b=0. 2.绝对值 |a|≥0. 3.倒数(1)0没有倒数 (2)乘积是1的两个数互为倒数.a、b互为倒数 . 4.平方根 (1)如果一个数的平方等于a,这个数就叫做a的平方根.一个正数有两个平方根,它们互为相反数;0有一个平方根,它是0本身;负数没有平方根.a(a≥0)的平方根记作. (2)一个正数a的正的平方根,叫做a的算术平方根.a(a≥0)的算术平方根记作. 5.立方根 如果x3=a,那么x叫做a的立方根.一个正数有一个正的立方根;一个负数有一个负的立方根;零的立方根是零. 【知识点三】实数与数轴 数轴定义:规定了原点,正方向和单位长度的直线叫做数轴,数轴的三要素缺一不可. 【知识点四】实数大小的比较 1.对于数轴上的任意两个点,靠右边的点所表示的数较大.

ISI Web of knowledge 详细使用教程

引言 ISI web of Knowledge是根据www的超连接特性,建立了一个以知识为基础的学术信息资源整合平台。它是一个采用“一站式”信息服务的设计思路构建而成的数字化研究环境。该平台以三大引文索引数据库作为其核心,利用信息资源之间的内在联系,把各种相关资源提供给研究人员。兼具知识的检索、提取、管理、分析与评价等多项功能。在ISI web of Knowledge平台上,还可以跨库检索ISI proceedings、Derwent 、Innovations Index、BIOSIS Previews、CAB Abstracts、INSPEC以及外部信息资源。ISI web of Knowledge还建立了与其他出版公司的数据库、原始文献、图书馆OPAC以及日益增多的网页等信息资源之间的相互连接。实现了信息内容、分析工具和文献信息资源管理软件的无缝连接。 一个综合性、多功能的研究平台,涵盖了自然科学、社会科学、艺术和人文科学等方方面面的高品质、多样化的学术信息,配以强大的检索和分析工具,使各种宝贵资源触手可及。无论所要找的资料在国际性期刊、开放资源、书籍、专利、汇编资料或网站上,您都可以轻松搞定,绝不会混在铺天盖地的垃圾信息里让您无所适从。 本次上机实验将对以下几个方面进行学习和实践: ◆查找出高影响力综述类文章。 ◆获取本技术领域的主要研究国家、核心期刊、高产出研究人员和机构等信息。 ◆定制Web of Science的跟踪服务,了解技术领域每月的最新进展。 ◆查询自己的论文(或某一重要论文)引用情况,并定制该论文的引文跟踪服务。 ◆获取本领域的Top10期刊信息。 一.获取高影响力综述 登陆并进入ISI Web of Knowledge主页:

教材全解青岛版七年级数学下册第十章检测题及答案解析

第10章 一次方程组检测题 (时间:90分钟,满分:100分) 一、选择题(每小题3分,共30分) 1. 下列方程中,是二元一次方程的是( ) A . B . C . 1x D . 2 4 y - 中,是二元一次方程组的有( ) A.2个 B.3个 C.4个 D.5个 3. 二元一次方程( ) A .有且只有一解 B .有无数个解 C .无解 D .有且只有两个解 4. 方程组 的解与的值相等,则等于( ) A.0 B.1 C.2 D.3 5. 某商店有两种进价不同的耳机都卖64元,其中一个盈利60%,另一个亏本20%,在这次买卖中,这家商店( ) A.赔8元 B.赚32元 C.不赔不赚 D.赚8元 6. (2019?山东泰安中考)小亮的妈妈用28元钱买了甲、乙两种水果,甲种水果每千克 4元,乙种水果每千克6元,且乙种水果比甲种水果少买了2千克,求小亮妈妈两种水果各买了多少千克?设小亮妈妈买了甲种水果x 千克,乙种水果y 千克,则可列方程组 为( ) A. B. C. D. 7. (2019·浙江宁波中考)如图,小明家的住房平面图是长方形, 被分割成3个正方形和2个长方形后仍是中心对称图形.若只知 道原住房平面图长方形的周长,则分割后不用测量就能知道周长 的图形的标号为( ) A.①② B.②③ C.①③ D.①②③ 8. 已知是方程组的解,则间的关系是( ) A. B. C. D. 9.如图,点O 在直线AB 上,OC 为射线,1∠比2∠的3倍少?10,设1∠,2∠的度数分别 为x ,y ,那么下列求出这两个角的度数的方程组正确的是( ) A.180,10x y x y +=?? =-? B.180, 310 x y x y +=??= -? C.180,10x y x y +=?? =+? D.3180, 310 y x y =??=-? 第7题图

七年级下册数学全解一元一次方程检测题

七年级下册数学全解一元一次方程检测题 一、填空题(每小题2分,共28分) 1、 一个数x 的2倍减去7的差, 得36 ,列方程为_______________________________; 2、 方程5 x – 6 = 0的解是x =________; 3、 日历中同一竖列相邻三个数的和为63,则这三个数分别为__________________; 4、 方程 5 12x x = -去分母得__________________________________; 5、 相邻5个自然数的和为45 ,则这5个自然数分别为 ______________________________; 6、 一根长18米的铁丝围成一个长是宽的2倍的长方形的面积为________________; 7、 一件衬衫进货价60元,提高50%标价为_______,八折优惠价为________,利润为 ______; 8、 鸡兔同笼共9只,,腿26条, 则鸡_____只、兔_____只; 9、 小明跑步每秒钟跑4米,则他15秒钟跑_____米,2分钟跑_____米,1小时跑____ 公里. 10、 如果()01122 =+++-y x x ,则2 1x y -的值是 . 11、 当=x ___时,代数式24+x 与93-x 的值互为相反数. 12、 在公式()h b a s += 2 1中,已知4,3,16===h a s ,则=b ___. 13、 如右图是2003年12月份的日历,现 用一长方形在日历中任意框出4个数, 请用一个等式表示d c b a ,,,之间的关系____. 14.若a 、b 互为相反数,c 、d 互为倒 数,p 的绝对值等于2,则关于x 的方 程(a+b)x 2+3cd ?x -p 2=0的解为________。 二、选择题(每小题2分,共28分) 1、下列方程中,是一元一次方程的是( ) (A );342 =-x x (B );0=x (C );12=+y x (D ).11x x = - 2、方程2 12= -x 的解是( ) (A );4 1-=x (B );4-=x (C );4 1 = x (D ).4-=x 3、已知等式523+=b a ,则下列等式中不一定... 成立的是( ) (A );253b a =- (B );6213+=+b a 日 一 二 三 四 五 六 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 a c b d

人教版七年级下册数学课本知识点归纳完整版59364

人教版七年级下册数学课本知识点归纳 第五章相交线与平行线 一、相交线两条直线相交,形成4个角。 1.邻补角:两个角有一条公共边,它们的另一条边互为反向延长线。具有这种关系的两个角,互为邻补角。如:∠1、∠2。 2.对顶角:两个角有一个公共顶点,并且一个角的两条 边,分别是另一个角的两条边的反向延长线,具有这种 关系的两个角,互为对顶角。如:∠1、∠3。 3.对顶角相等。 二、垂线 1.垂直:如果两条直线相交成直角,那么这两条直线互相垂直。2.垂线:垂直是相交的一种特殊情形,两条直线垂直,其中一条直线叫做另一条直线的垂线。 3.垂足:两条垂线的交点叫垂足。 4.垂线特点:过一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线垂直。 5.点到直线的距离:直线外一点到这条直线的垂线段的长度,叫点到直线的距离。连接直线外一点与直线上各点的所有线段中,垂线段最短。 三、同位角、内错角、同旁内角两条直线被第三条直线所截形成8个角。 1.同位角:在两条直线的上方,又在直线EF的同侧,具有这种位置

关系的两个角叫同位角。如:∠1和∠5。 2.内错角:在在两条直线之间,又在直线EF的两侧,具有这种位置关系的两个角叫内错角。如:∠3和∠5。 3.同旁内角:在在两条直线之间,又在直线EF的同侧, 具有这种位置关系的两个角叫同旁内角。如:∠3和∠6。 四、平行线 (一)平行线 1.平行:两条直线不相交。互相平行的两条直线,互为平行线。a∥b (在同一平面内,不相交的两条直线叫做平行线。) 2.平行公理:经过直线外一点,有且只有一条直线与这条直线平行。 3.平行公理推论:①平行于同一直线的两条直线互相平行。 ②在同一平面内,垂直于同一直线的两条直线互相平行。 (二)平行线的判定: 1.同位角相等,两直线平行。 2.内错角相等,两直线平行。 3.同旁内角互补,两直线平行。 (三)平行线的性质 1.两条平行线被第三条直线所截,同位角相等。 2.两条平行线被第三条直线所截,内错角相等。 3.两条平行线被第三条直线所截,同旁内角互补。 4.两条平行线被第三条直线所截,外错角相等。 以上性质可简单说成:

新人教版七年级下册数学知识点整理-

最新版人教版七年级数学下册知识点 第五章 相交线与平行线 一、知识网络结构 二、知识要点 1、在同一平面内,两条直线的位置关系有 两 种: 相交 和 平行 , 垂直 是相交的一种特殊情况。 2、在同一平面内,不相交的两条直线叫 平行线 。如果两条直线只有 一个 公共点,称这两条直线相交;如果两条直线 没有 公共点,称这两条直线平行。 3、两条直线相交所构成的四个角中,有 公共顶点 且有 一条公共边 的两个角是邻补角。邻补角的性质: 邻补角互补 。如图1所示, 与 互为邻补角, 与 互为邻补角。 + = 180°; + = 180° ; + = 180°; + = 180°。 4、两条直线相交所构成的四个角中,一个角的两边分别是另一个角的两边的 反向延长线 ,这样的两个角互为 对顶角 。对顶角的性质:对顶角相等。如图1?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????平移 命题、定理的两直线平行:平行于同一条直线性质角互补 :两直线平行,同旁内性质相等:两直线平行,内错角性质相等:两直线平行,同位角性质平行线的性质的两直线平行 :平行于同一条直线判定直线平行 :同旁内角互补,两判定线平行 :内错角相等,两直判定线平行 :同位角相等,两直判定定义平行线的判定平行线,不相交的两条直线叫平行线:在同一平面内平行线及其判定内角同位角、内错角、同旁垂线 相交线相交线相交线与平行线 4321 4321____________________________:! 1 3 4 2

所示, 与 互为对顶角。 = ; = 。 / 5、两条直线相交所成的角中,如果有一个是 直角或90°时,称这两条直线互相垂直, 其中一条叫做另一条的垂线。如图2所示,当 = 90°时, 垂线的性质: 性质1:过一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线垂直。 性质2:连接直线外一点与直线上各点的所有线段中,垂线段最短。 性质3:如图2所示,当 a ⊥ b 时, = = = = 90°。 点到直线的距离:直线外一点到这条直线的垂线段的长度叫点到直线的距离。6、同位角、内错角、同旁内角基本特征: ①在两条直线(被截线)的 同一方 ,都在第三条直线(截线)的两个角叫 同位角 。图3中,共有 对同位角: 与 是同位角; 与 是同位角; 与 是同位角; 与 是同位角。 ②在两条直线(被截线) 之间 ,并且在第三条直线(截线)的 两侧 ,这样的两个角叫 内错角 。图3中,共有 对内错角: 与 是内错角; 与 是内错角。 ③在两条直线(被截线)的 之间 ,都在第三条直线(截线)的 同一旁 ,这样的两 个角叫 同旁内角 。图3中,共有 对同旁内角: 与 是同旁内角; 与 是同旁内角。 : 7、平行公理:经过直线外一点有且只有一条直线与已知直线平行。 平行公理的推论:如果两条直线都与第三条直线平行,那么这两条直线也互相平行。 平行线的性质: 图3 图4 a 5 7 8 6 > 3 4 2 b c

北师大版七年级数学(下册)三角形难题全解

来源:2011-2012学年省市潮南区中考模拟考试数学卷(解析版) 考点:三角形 如图,已知,等腰Rt△OAB中,∠AOB=90o,等腰Rt△EOF中,∠EOF=90o,连结AE、BF. 求证:(1)AE=BF;(2)AE⊥BF. 【答案】 见解析 【解析】解:(1)证明:在△AEO与△BFO中, ∵Rt△OAB与Rt△EOF等腰直角三角形, ∴AO=OB,OE=OF,∠AOE=90o-∠BOE=∠BOF, ∴△AEO≌△BFO, ∴AE=BF; ( 2)延长AE交BF于D,交OB于C,则∠BCD=∠ACO, 由(1)知:∠OAC=∠OBF, ∴∠BDA=∠AOB=90o, ∴AE⊥BF. (1)可以把要证明相等的线段AE,CF放到△AEO,△BFO中考虑全等的条件,由两个等腰直角三角形得AO=BO,OE=OF,再找夹角相等,这两个夹角都是直角

减去∠BOE的结果,所以相等,由此可以证明△AEO≌△BFO; (2)由(1)知:∠OAC=∠OBF,∴∠BDA=∠AOB=90°,由此可以证明AE⊥BF 来源:2012-2013学年省八年级上期中考试数学试卷(解析版) 考点:四边形 如图,在正方形ABCD中,E是AD的中点,F是BA延长线上的一点,AF=AB,已知△ABE≌△ADF. (1)在图中,可以通过平移、翻折、旋转中哪一种方法,使△ABE变到△ADF 的位置; (2)线段BE与DF有什么关系?证明你的结论. 【答案】 (1)绕点A旋转90°;(2)BE=DF,BE⊥DF. 【解析】本题考查的是旋转的性质,全等三角形的判断和性质 (1)根据旋转的概念得出; (2)根据旋转的性质得出△ABE≌△ADF,从而得出BE=DF,再根据正方形的性质得出BE⊥DF. (1)图中是通过绕点A旋转90°,使△ABE变到△ADF的位置. (2)BE=DF,BE⊥DF; 延长BE交DF于G;

相关主题