DesignReviewProcess

Design Review Process

Project Details

Date:

Prepared by:Phone: Email:

Project name:

Project type:

?New project ?Dot release ?Minor revision

?Copy only?Graphic only ?Project flag

Overview

The Design Review Process is a mechanism for ensuring design standards, alignment, and diligence throughout the course of the product design process: Standards

●Ensure that designs meet appropriate standards for consistency,

accessibility, usability, internationalizability, rebrandability, download

time, etc.

Alignment

●Ensure that designs meet business goals.

●Ensure that designs can be well integrated into the brands (if any) on

which they will be deployed.

●Minimize late-stage changes to product requirements and concepts. Diligence

●Realize maximum value from early-stage design methodologies.

●Increase accountability and clarity of action plans by keeping minutes

of each design review.

●Involve people outside the design team at appropriate junctures. Steps in the Design Review Process

1.Conceptual Design Preview

Use this step to ensure that the initial design direction maps to the

business goals and user needs, and to review the design for alignment

with broader initiatives and possible integration with other product

designs.

2.Design Standards Checkpoint

Use this step to confirm that the design meets required design

standards.

3.UI Design Review

Use this step to review specific interaction behaviors and to provide

guidance to designers on problematic issues.

4.Creative Direction Review

Use this step to ensure that the visual design maps to the creative

direction of the project.

Scheduling Product Design Reviews

Use this section to list the regularly scheduled meeting times for Product Design Reviews. Include the review meeting days and times (for example, “Wednesdays from 9 am to 10 pm”), and any other information about review meeting schedules (for example, indicate here if no formal review meeting is scheduled for a particular step in the Design Review Process).

Sending Review Materials Out in Advance

Use this section to indicate how the materials to be reviewed at the meetings should be made available to the reviewers. Include the following types of information: ?How far in advance the review materials need to be made available before the scheduled review meeting (for example, one business day, two business days, one week, etc.)

?How materials should be distributed to the reviewers (for example, placed on

a we

b server, sent as e-mail attachments, etc.)

?The format materials should use (for example, .doc, .pdf, .html, .jpg, .gif, all of the above, etc.)

? A list of related materials that should also be made available (for example, meeting minutes from earlier, related reviews, a Creative Brief, etc.)

Product Design Review Minutes

Use this section to describe when and how meeting m inutes should be generated: ?Indicate if any meetings do not require minutes.

?Indicate who is responsible for recording and distributing minutes at each meeting. You can indicate a specific person or a role (for example, “Design

Lead”).

?Indicate how or where the minutes will be made available to team members.