sci投稿各种coverletter大全

Cover letter模板大全

1.第一次投稿Cover letter：主要任务是介绍文章主要创新以及声明没有一稿多投

Dear Editors:

We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.

The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:

1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××

2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××

We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

二、催稿信：询问稿件处理到声明步骤

Dear Prof. ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire a bout the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

三、修改稿Cover letter

Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:

On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).

We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.

We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）

List of Responses

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:

Responds to the reviewer’s comments:

Reviewer #1:

1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)

Response: ××××××

。。。。。。

逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏

针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：

We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...

We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...

It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……

We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.

We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion

As Reviewer suggested that……

Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……

最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：

Special thanks to you for your good comments.

Reviewer #2:

同上述

Reviewer #3:

××××××

Other changes:

1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”

2. Line 107, “……” was added

3. Line 129, “……” was deleted

××××××

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.

We appreciate for Edi tors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）

Dear Prof. ××××××:

Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）

Dear ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?

I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply.

I am very pleased to hear from you.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

七、文章校稿信件

Dear Mr. ×××:

Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper

Title” (ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.

Corrections:

1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)

2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****) Answers for “author queries”:

1. *********************.

2. **********************

3. **********************

We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

××××××

Corresponding author:

Name: ×××

E-mail: ××××@××××

SCI收录期刊投稿全过程英文信件模板一览

SCI收录期刊投稿全过程英文信件模板一览 一、最初投稿Cover letter Dear Editors: We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed. In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”. The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration: 1) Name A E-mail: ××××@×××× 2) Name B E-mail: ××××@×××× We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below. Thank you and best regards. Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ××× E-mail: ××××@×××× 二、催稿信 Dear Prof. ×××: Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not? I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best regards! Yours sincerely, ×××××× Corresponding author: Name: ×××

SCISSCI 投稿过程总结

SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、修稿处理、拒稿后对策及接受后总结等（一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项： 总结提示语：1)第一作者和通信作者的区别： 通信作者（Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工作的主导者，也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后（使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author)，但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人，负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的，说明思路是通讯作者的，而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的，且是最主要的参与者！ 通信作者标注名称：Corresponding author，To whom correspondence should be addressed,或The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed 若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的，可以采取“共同第一作者”（joint first author)的署名方式，并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署： 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址，邮政编码。有二位或多位作者，则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出，并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者，作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达，并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号（*）、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。

elsevier投稿模板

[Title Page] Article Title Authors Author affiliations Correspondence information: Corresponding author name, affiliation, detailed permanent address, email address, telephone number (Check the Guide for authors to see the required information on the title page)

Put the title of your abstract here using both upper and lower case letters, Times New Roman, 12 pts, bold, centered, double spaced A. Author a, B. Author b, C. Author a,* a Department, University, Street, Postal-Code City, Country b Laboratory, Institute, Street, Postal-Code City, Country Abstract This general template helps you on preparing manuscript for part of Elsevier Journals. Use this document as a template if you are using Microsoft Word 6.0 or later. Here comes self-contained abstract. Please read the Guide for Authors of your target journal for the requirements of Abstract. Pay special attention to the word count. PACS(optional, as per journal): 75.40.-s; 71.20.LP Keywords:Keyword 1.D; Keyword 2.B (Read the Guide for Authors for the requirements for Keywords, including number, thesaurus, and classification indications) * Corresponding author. Tel.: +xx xxx xx xx; fax: +xx xxx xx xx. E-mail address: xxxxx@xxx.xx

怎样投稿SCI期刊

English Editing Service: https://www.sodocs.net/doc/541645093.html, How to Submit a Research Paper to a Journal In the later stages of your doctoral studies in Mathematics, one of the important things you will need to do is to submit one or more papers to research journals for possible publication. You should do this as soon as your dissertation adviser tells you that your research is ready for publication, but not before! If you are co-authoring a paper with your adviser, then he or she may be handling the submission details as the senior co-author. If so, ask your adviser to use the submission process to teach you how it is done, so you will be able to do this yourself in the future. However, if you are submitting a paper as the sole or senior author, then you will need know how to handle this process yourself. Over the years, there have been advanced graduate students who could have benefited from some general advice about the submission process. This letter has been written in the hope that you will navigate the publication process smoothly. Remember that any papers based on your dissertation research should include a grateful acknowledgment - either in the introductory section, as a footnote, or at the end. State that this work is part of your doctoral dissertation at Louisiana State University and thank your adviser. Your acknowledgment of the role of your doctoral adviser may help to insure that a journal editor takes your work seriously, since it has at least passed the scrutiny of your adviser. If other mathematicians have helped, thank them too. Most mathematicians are generous about sharing their ideas, but they will surely notice and remember if you fail to acknowledge them. This is good advice to remember for the future as well. You should give careful thought to your paper's introduction. The introduction to your paper should explain clearly what your main results are and why they are interesting or important. The introduction should tell your audience how your mathematical work is related to recent research in the area. It is very important to properly reference these works. A referee for your paper may be chosen from among the researchers whose work you cite. You would like the introduction to motivate readers to read more. Read the introductions from leading researchers in your area to give you ideas about what you should include in your introduction. Ask your adviser read your entire paper and listen carefully to his or her suggestions. It takes much experience to know how to write well for a research journal. It is likely that you will need to go through several thorough revisions before your adviser is pleased with your writing. Expect this to happen and learn from the process. It will benefit you for years to come. It is important that your paper be sent to referees with current expertise in the field of your research. With this in mind, the first thing to do is to ask your adviser to suggest a suitable journal and a suitable editor to whom to send your paper. Your adviser may know that a certain journal is an active venue for publication in your field. Before you and your adviser make a final choice of the journal to which you will submit your paper, you may be well-advised to check the backlog of the journals that you are considering. Especially during the early years of your career, you may have a practical need to get several papers into print without very long delays.Backlog information is often available at the journals' websites, as explained below. Another useful type of information which is available is the Mathematics Citation Quotient(the ratio of the number citations to the number of papers in a given journal) which is available on MathSciNet through any LSU campus computer,or from home through PAWS and the LSU Library resources.For instance, in 2004 the MCQ of Transactions of the AMS is listed at a bit more than 0.6, whereas for the Journal of the AMS it is above 2. Another citation index is available through the LSU Library. From the LSU Libraries Indexes and Databases page, which is available through your PAWS account even from home, select Web of Knowledge in the Frequently Used Databases menu.Then select Journal Citation Reports from the menu at the top of the ISI Web of Knowledge page. Many journals have websites, which you should visit to read their instructions for authors. For example the AMS Journals use this page: Information for Authors. Here is a link to a page for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society: Submissions to Transactions. You will note

sci期刊论文格式要求-sci论文格式要求

sci期刊论文格式要求:sci论文格式要求 SCI是目前国际上最具权威性的、用于基础研究和应用基础研究成果的重要评价体系。它的论文格式是怎么样的呢?下面是小编精心推荐的一些sci期刊论文格式要求，希望你能有所感触! sci期刊论文格式要求 1、题目：应简洁、明确、有概括性，字数不宜超过20个字。 2、摘要：要有高度的概括力，语言精练、明确，中文摘要约100200字; 3、关键词：从论文标题或正文中挑选3～5个最能表达主要内容的词作为关键词。 4、目录：写出目录，标明页码。 5、正文： 论文正文字数一般应在3000字以上。 论文正文：包括前言、本论、结论三个部分。 前言(引言)是论文的开头部分，主要说明论文写作的目的、现实意义、对所研究问题的认识，并提出论文的中心论点等。前言要写得简明扼要，篇幅不要太长。 本论是论文的主体，包括研究内容与方法、实验材料、实验结果与分析(讨论)等。在本部分要运用各方面的研究方法和实验结果，分析问题，论证观点，尽量反映出自己的科研能力和学术水平。 结论是论文的收尾部分，是围绕本论所作的结束语。其基本的要点就是总结全文，加深

题意。 6、谢辞：简述自己通过做论文的体会，并应对指导教师和协助完成论文的有关人员表示谢意。 7、参考文献：在论文末尾要列出在论文中参考过的专著、论文及其他资料，所列参考文献应按文中参考或引证的先后顺序排列。 8、注释：在论文写作过程中，有些问题需要在正文之外加以阐述和说明。 9、附录：对于一些不宜放在正文中，但有参考价值的内容，可编入附录中。 关于sci的论文范文 美国《SCI》收录温州医学院论文分析 【摘要】目的: 了解温州医学院(以下简称：温医)作者论文被SCI收录情况。方法：根据SCI-E数据库检索统计1998-2007年温医作者SCI产文情况。结果：1998-2007年温医作者发表SCI论文总数为304篇，其中2005-2007年为247篇，占81.2%;论文类型：论著259篇，占85.2%;发表论文最多的学科是眼科，为32篇，占10.5%，其次生物化学为30篇，占9.8%;发表SCI论文最多的前3位作者为瞿佳、吕帆、李校;被引用的有143篇，被引率为47%，总被引用次数为732次，篇均被引频次为2.41次，单篇论文引用频率最高的为77次，其中引用10次以上的论文17篇，占总被引文章数的11.9%。结论：2005年以来SCI收录温医论文逐年增加，收录的论文涉及各个学科，其中以眼科和生物化学为主。 【关键词】SCI;论文;温州医学院 Abstract: Objective: To know the situation of the authors’papers of Wenzhou Medical College embodied by AmericaSCI. Methods: Papers written by authors of Wenzhou Medical College embodied by AmericaSCIpublished from 1998 to 2007 were counted based upon the researching of SCI-E database. Results: The total number of papers published by authors of Wenzhou Medical College embodied by AmericaSCIin 1998-2007 was 304 pieces of paper. Of which，247 papers were published in 2005-2007，accounting for 81.2%. Paper type: 259 papers were treatise，accounting for 85.2%. The discipline published the most papers was ophthalmology. They published 32 papers，accounting for 10.5%;the second one was biochemistry，they published 30 ones，accounting for 9.8%. The top authors of publishing SCI papers were QU Jia，LV Fan

SCI英文论文审稿意见汇总

英文论文审稿意见汇总 以下12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。1、目标和结果不清晰。 It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。 ◆In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me thods used in the study. ◆Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided. 3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨： The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation. 5、对hypothesis的清晰界定： A hypothesis needs to be presented。 6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念： What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio? 7、对研究问题的定义： Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem 8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel. 9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification: There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work. ：题问度谨严、10． MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that. 11、格式（重视程度）： ◆In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples. ◆Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared

SCI投稿全攻略

SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后处理对策及接受后期相关问答综合荟萃目录 （重点是一、二、四、五、六）： （一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 （二）SCI期刊投稿各种状态详解及实例综合（学习各种投稿状态+投稿经历总结） （三）问答综合篇（是否催稿、如何撤稿、一稿两投及学术不端相关内容等） （四）如何处理审稿意见（回复意见、补实验、润色、重整数据、作图及调整、申辩及其他）（五）Reject 或者Reject and resubmit后的对策和处理 （六）稿件接受后期相关问题（作者信息、地址版权、单行本、彩图费、版面费、如何汇款、清样相关等） （七）进阶篇（如何选投SCI杂志、各专业方向期刊选择、SCI写作经验） （一）投稿前准备工作和需要注意的事项、投稿过程相关经验总结 1)第一作者和通信作者的区别： 通信作者（Corresponding author)通常是实际统筹处理投稿和承担答复审稿意见等工作的主导者，也常是稿件所涉及研究工作的负责人。 通信作者的姓名多位列于论文作者名单的最后（使用符号来标识说明是Corresponding author)，但其贡献不亚于论文的第一作者。 通讯作者往往指课题的总负责人，负责与编辑部的一切通信联系和接受读者的咨询等。 文章的成果是属于通讯作者的，说明思路是通讯作者的，而不是第一作者。 第一作者仅代表是你做的，且是最主要的参与者！ 通信作者标注名称：Corresponding author，To whom correspondence should be addressed,或The person to whom inquiries regarding the paper should be addressed.若两个以上的作者在地位上是相同的，可以采取“共同第一作者”（joint first author)的署名方式，并说明These authors contributed equally to the work。 2)作者地址的标署： 尽可能地给出详细通讯地址，邮政编码。有二位或多位作者，则每一不同的地址应按之中出现的先后顺序列出，并以相应上标符号的形式列出与相应作者的关系。 如果第一作者不是通讯作者，作者应该按期刊的相关规定表达，并提前告诉编辑。期刊大部分以星号（*）、脚注或者致谢形式标注通讯联系人。 3)挑选审稿人的几个途径： 很多SCI杂志都需要作者自己提出该篇论文的和您研究领域相关的审稿人，比较常见的是三名左右，也有的杂志要求5-8人。 介绍几个方法： ①利用SCI、SSCI、A&HCI、ISTP检索和您研究相关的科学家； ②文章中的参考文献； ③相关期刊编委或学术会议的主席、委员； ④以前发表的类似文章的审稿人； ⑤询问比较熟识的一些专业人士； ⑥交叉审稿，邀请以前的作者； ⑦若是团队序贯研究，斟酌考虑自建期刊审稿人专家库。 PS: 如果有熟悉的同领域的专家，可以推荐一两位为宜（若你全部推荐熟人也无可厚非，但编辑基本不会全部考虑，可能对你还有点特殊“眼色”了）。考虑推荐自己文章的参考文献作者较为常用，当然，如果你是负面引用的话，务必慎重了。

elsevier期刊投稿须知

https://www.sodocs.net/doc/541645093.html,/infman/登录系统 https://www.sodocs.net/doc/541645093.html,/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505553/authorinstructions 用户投稿手册 Use of wordprocessing software It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the wordprocessor used. The text should be in single-column format.Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the wordprocessor's options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italics, subscripts, superscripts etc. When preparing tables, if you are using a table grid, u se only one grid for each individual table and not a grid for each row. If no grid is used, use tabs, not spaces, to align columns. The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier: https://www.sodocs.net/doc/541645093.html,/guidepublication). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics will be required whether or not you embed your figures in the text. See also the section on Electronic artwork. To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check' functions of your wordprocessor. Article structure Authors should use a scientific/engineering attitude towards their analyses. The numbers computed should have the appropriate number of significant figures. Please do not use more significant figures than the observations allow (i.e., for most surveys 2 or 3 are sufficient). Decimal fractions should have a leading zero, e.g. 0.001 rather than .001 Authors are encouraged to look at the articles recently published inthe journal to understand the aims of the journal. Essential title page information ? Title.Concise and informative. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible. ? Author names and affiliations.Where the family name may be ambiguous (e.g., a double name), please indicate this clearly. Present the authors' affiliation addresses (where the actual work was done) below the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-case superscript letter immediately after the author's name and in front of the appropriate address. Provide the full postal address of each affiliation, including the country name and,if available, the e-mail address of each author. ? Corresponding author.Clearly indicate who will handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also post-publication. Ensure that

SCI投稿状态

SCI投稿状态自己查-投稿术语名词解释 1. Submitted to journal 刚提交的状态 2. Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功。 3. with editor 如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态： 3.1 A waiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑 Editor assignment 是把你的文章分给另一个编辑处理了。 3.2 technical check in progress 检查你的文章符合不符合期刊的投稿要求 3.3 Editor Declined Invitation 如果编辑接收处理了就会邀请审稿人了。 4. 随后也会有2种状态 4.1 Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找到审稿人就自己决定了，那根据一般经验，对学生来说估计就会挂了1）英文太差，编辑让修改。2）内容太差，要拒了。除非大牛们直接被接收。 4.2 Review(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿 5 Under review 这应该是一个漫长的等待。当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 6. Required Reviews Completed 审稿人的意见已经上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定 7. Evaluating Recommendation 评估审稿人的意见，随后你将受到编辑给你的decision 8. Minor revision/ Major revision 这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。具体怎么改就不多说了，谦虚谨慎是不可少的。 9. Revision submitted to journal 又开始了一个循环 10 Accepted 恭喜了 11. Transfer copyright form 签版权协议 12. Uncorrected proof 等待你校对样稿 13. In press, corrected proof 文章在印刷中，且该清样已经过作者校对 14. Manuscript sent to production 排版 15. in production 出版中

Elsevier投稿的一些问题

关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿1 关于Elsevier旗下期刊投稿概述 (1) Elsevier旗下共有1300多种期刊。投稿时采用的是Elsevier Editorial System (EES)投稿系统 (2) 审稿时间。通常不会超过半年，如果半年时间到，部分审稿意见没有返回，期刊社同样会把已返回的意见返回给你。 (3) 版权问题。一般会通过给你发几个PDF合同，然后你打印出来，用手填写，然后邮寄或者扫描后通过email发给他们。 (4) 投稿模板。通常很多人都会关心这个问题，这是投稿的第一步。但是Elsevier 旗下期刊对投稿的模板没什么要求，只要你比较注意排版，看着舒服就好。至于排版，录用后他们编辑会排版，然后让你来校正。建议，投稿时候不要考虑纸张页数，国外期刊不太关心期刊页数，只要按他们最后的排版不超过30页（好像是30页）一般不会收钱。(5) 如果投稿论文分成几个部分，在投稿的时候就要分开，按照单独的论文投稿。不过要在Letter to Editor中要说明这是同一个论文。 (6) Elsevier旗下期刊投稿不收取审稿费，发表也不收取版面费，但超过一定页数会适当收取费用，如果用彩色印刷，也会收钱，他们不收则以，一收就比较多。 (7) 投稿时是否需要把图片和论文主题分开。这个本来不需要说的，网站上的要求就是如此，需要单独分开上传，但是以我的经验，如果论文图太多，特别是对于国内的网速慢，上传很不方便，可以直接把图放在论文中间，审稿阶段不用考虑图文分开，等录用后再图文分开。 2 Elsevier投稿状态总结 (1) Submitted to Journal 刚提交的状态 (2) Manuscript received by Editorial Office 就是你的文章到了编辑手里了，证明投稿成功 (3) With editor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编辑。这当中就会有另两个状态： 1) Awaiting Editor Assignment指派责任编辑 Editor assigned是把你的文章分给一个编辑处理了。 2) Editor Declined Invitation 也可能编辑会拒绝邀请，这就需要重新指定编辑 3) technical check in progress 检查你的文章符不符合期刊投稿要求 (4) 编辑接手处理后也会有2种状态 1) Decision Letter Being Prepared 就是编辑没找审稿人就自己决定了， 2) Reviewer(s) invited 找到审稿人了，就开始审稿 (5) Under review 这应该是一个漫长的等待。当然前面各步骤也可能很慢的，要看编辑的处理情况。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 (6) Required Reviews Completed 审稿人的意见已上传，审稿结束，等待编辑决定 (7) uating Recommendation 评估审稿人的意见，随后你将收到编辑给你的decision (8) Minor revision/Major revision 这个时候可以稍微庆祝一下了，问题不大了，因为有修改就有可能。 (9) Revision Submitted to Journal. 又开始了一个循环。