搜档网
当前位置:搜档网 › Characterizing microstructure of refractory porous materials

Characterizing microstructure of refractory porous materials

Characterizing microstructure of refractory porous materials
Characterizing microstructure of refractory porous materials

J M A T E R S C I41(2006)3403–3415

Characterizing microstructure of refractory

porous materials

XIN CHEN,DAYAKAR PENUMADU?

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department,University of Tennessee,223Perkins Hall, Knoxville,TN37996,USA

E-mail:dpenumad@https://www.sodocs.net/doc/946888458.html,

Published online:12April2006

Liquid Expulsion technique was used in this study to quantify the transport properties and microstructure of a refractory coating used in the Lost Foam Casting process.The pore size information obtained from the Liquid Expulsion Method is found to be well correlated with the transport properties of the porous coating material.For manufacturing process control,the viscosity of these coating slurries prior to its application on expanded polystyrene foam is often reduced by dilution with water and/or using a dispersant.In this paper,the effects of diluting or dispersing the slurry on the microstructure and transport properties of the dried refractory coatings are evaluated.Results show that the dilution and dispersion have opposing in?uences on the pore size and transport properties.Adding dispersant was found to reduce the transport properties of the refractory coatings signi?cantly,potentially leading to defects in metal castings.The pore characterization technique developed in this paper is also used to determine the effects of drying methods(oven versus air dry)on the pore size and transport properties.

C 2006Springer Science+Business Media,Inc.

1.Introduction

Microstructure is one of the important factors governing the transport behavior of a porous medium,such as its Darcy coef?cient,and the related properties such as ther-mal conductivity and density.Therefore,it is necessary to understand the microstructure of porous media such as the pore size and distribution.A number of experimental tech-niques and commercial instruments are available for de-termining pore size distribution,such as:Scanning Elec-tron Microscopy(SEM),Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP),the Bubble pressure and gas transport method,Gas Absorption,and the Liquid Displacement Method(LDM) [1–3].In a porous medium that originates from drying of slurries,voids exist as the spaces between the particles. Some of them are connected to each other,forming the channels for the air/liquid to pass through,which are con-sidered effective pores.Some voids are isolated and not open to the atmosphere and are considered ineffective pores.For a porous medium,the transport properties are particularly related to the effective pores in the porous structure.Therefore,the effective pore size and pore size distribution are important for understanding the physical behavior of a porous medium.

?Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

In this paper,a technique known as water-expulsion porosimetry,also called the Liquid Expulsion method, proposed by Gelinas and Angers[4],was used to charac-terize the microstructure information of ceramic coatings. The results from this study are compared with those ob-tained using the mercury intrusion method.The major purpose of this paper was to investigate the applicability of such a technique for refractory porous materials used in foundry industries.The relationship between the exper-imentally determined pore size information and the cor-responding transport properties of these refractory porous materials was also investigated.In addition,this paper also studied the in?uences of dilution/dispersion and different drying procedures(oven and air)on the microstructure and transport properties of lost foam casting coatings. 2.Background

In this work,the applicability of the Liquid Expulsion Method was investigated to evaluate the microstructure of refractory coatings used in a relatively new metal cast-ing technique called Lost Foam Casting(LFC).LFC,also known as Expandable Polystyrene Casting(EPC),is a

0022-2461C 2006Springer Science+Business Media,Inc.

DOI:10.1007/s10853-005-5342-93403

popular casting method being used as a replacement for the conventional casting techniques to obtain near net-shape metal castings.The casting products are produced by pouring molten metal into a foam pattern that is coated with refractory material,which is then surrounded and compacted by unbonded sand through vibration.The foam pattern degrades into gas and vents into the loose sand af-ter the molten metal is introduced,and the metal then?lls the foam pattern to get the?nal product.In order to ensure the adequate thermal properties of?lling molten metal and the venting of pyrolysis products,the EPS foam pattern is coated with refractory slurry.The refractory coating has to be strong enough to resist the pressure to avoid metal pen-etration defects.At the same time it should have adequate transport properties to allow the escape of the degraded materials(styrene gas predominantly)to avoid defects in the metal casting,such as mis-runs,folds,and porosity [5–14].These refractory coatings are initially applied to the polystyrene foam patterns in a slurry stage and are allowed to dry.The microstructure of these porous mate-rials is complex and affects the mechanical strength and transport properties of the refractory coating.Therefore, the characterization of pore size and pore size distribution is important for developing new and novel coatings and also for manufacturing process control in LFC foundries.

3.Experiments

Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry has been widely used in the past as a technique to characterize the microstructure of porous media[15–18].Thus,this paper includes com-parison results from the Mercury intrusion method and the Liquid Expulsion Method developed in this study. Non-wetting material such as mercury is used in the Mercury Intrusion Method.As a non-wetting material, mercury will not spontaneously wet most surfaces or en-ter the pores in a solid because of its high surface ten-sion.In order to?ll the pores with mercury,external pressure is needed to force mercury into the pores.If a cylindrical pore model is assumed,the relationship be-tween pressure and pore size is given by the Washburn equation[20].Because the sizes of the pores that can be?lled with mercury are inversely proportional to the applied pressure,mercury intrudes the bigger pore?rst and,successively,the smaller ones with in-creasing pressures.Thus,the pore size distribution can be determined by monitoring the volume of intruded mercury as a function of increasing applied pressure [19].In this study,the pore size analysis was eval-uated by a Poromaster60(Quantachrome Corpora-tion),which can generate a maximum intrusion pres-sure of413.7Mpa for pore size analysis from approx-imately950microns to0.0036microns equivalent pore diameter.

According to Hernandez et al.[21],Bechhold et al.

[22]were the?rst to use the Liquid Expulsion Method to evaluate pore size by measuring the pressure to blow air through water-?lled https://www.sodocs.net/doc/946888458.html,tely,the Liquid Expulsion Method has been modi?ed in several ways and adopted by ASTM and British Standards Institu-tion for determining pore size characteristics of porous materials[23–25].The Liquid Expulsion Method uses a wetting liquid instead of a non-wetting liquid to mea-sure pore size.The wetting liquids will spontaneously ?ow into pores in the solid,and work is required to re-move the wetting liquid from the pores.A relationship between the applied pressure,the?ow rate of the air through saturated porous materials,and pore size can be used to estimate the pore size distribution of porour materials.

In this work,the pore size analysis was investigated by a Capillary Flow Porometer(Porous Material Inc.)

[26]and a portable automated porometry system de-veloped at the University of Tennessee[27],which can generate pressure to 3.45MPa for pore size analy-sis from over500micron to0.013micron pore di-ameter.The sample was soaked in a wetting liquid (Galwick)of low surface tension(γ=0.0156N/m),low vapour pressure and low reactivity.The saturated sample was then subjected to increasing pressure.As the pres-sure increases,it will reach a point where applied pressure overcomes the surface tension of the liquid in the largest pores and will push the liquid out.This minimum pres-sure required to push the liquid out from largest effective pore and make the?rst detectable?ow is called“bub-ble pressure,”which is used to calculate the“bubble pore size”—the maximum pore size.Continuing to increase the pressure further allows the air to empty smaller pores.By testing the sample both in the dry condition and the satu-rated(wet)condition,it is possible to obtain a plot of?ow rate versus applied pressure,as illustrated in Fig.1.When the applied pressure empties all of the pores saturated with Galwick,the?ow rate vs.pressure curve(?ow-pressure curve)will return to the?ow-pressure curve of the dry sample.By comparing the gas?ow rate of both a wet and dry sample at the same pressure,the percentage of the?ow passing through the sample caused by the

pores Figure1Typical?ow rate versus applied pressure for wet and dry samples.

3404

larger than or equal to the speci?ed size can be calculated as:

%Filter Flow Percentage =

wet ?ow rate

dry ?ow rate

×100(1)

The ?ow caused by the pore size in a certain range between d1and d2can also be calculated as

%Filter Flow Percentage (d 2?d 1)

= Q w 2Q d 2?Q w 1Q d 1

×100

(2)

The mean ?ow pore size is determined by the inter-section of a wet ?ow-pressure curve and a half dry ?ow-pressure curve,where the ?ow rate through the wet sample

is one half of the ?ow rate through the dry sample at the same pressure.The corresponding pressure is called the mean ?ow pressure.

3.1.Evaluation of transport properties

Transport properties of porous materials are generally characterized using their permeability coef?cients.In this work,Forchheimer’s equation [28]is used to calculate the permeability coef?cient of the refractory LFC coatings.Forchheimer’s equation has proven to be more appropri-ate for estimating the transport properties of the refractory LFC coating in a relatively wide range of applied pres-sures [27],since it includes parabolic parts in the equation by considering the in?uence of inertia and turbulence.Forchheimer’s equation can be written as

P 2i ?P 2

02P L =μk 1νs +ρk 2

ν2

s .

(3)

where ρis the ?uid density;constant k 1and k 2are the Darcian (viscous)permeability and non-Darcian (inertia)permeability coef?cients,respectively;νs is the ?uid ve-locity,calculated by dividing the exit volumetric ?ow rate Q by the cross-sectional area A .μis the viscosity of the ?uid.P i is the pressure at the sample entrance;P o is the pressure at the sample exit;and P is the ?uid pressure at which Q and μare measured or calculated.In gen-eral,P equals to P o .L is the coating thickness.In this research,permeability coef?cients were obtained by ?t-ting experimental data through the least squares method to Equation 3.

The term “?ow factor”as de?ned in Equation 4was developed in this study for transport property comparison purposes for coating materials of differing composition.It not only considers the effect of the material’s microstruc-ture (for example,Darcian permeability coef?cient)but also considers another key factor controlling the coating’s transport properties,its average thickness.This “?ow fac-tor”can be used to compare different types of coatings’

transport properties at the same differential pressure.A large “?ow factor”indicates high transport capability.

Flow Factor =

k 1L

(4)

3.2.Sample preparation

In this work,fourteen different types of Lost Foam Casting refractory coating have been investigated.These slurries were produced for two major automotive Powertrain LFC foundries by three commercial suppliers.These coating slurries were used for different parts,such as an engine block or a cylinder head.These water-based coatings con-sist of silica,mica,binding clay,synthetic ceramic parti-cles,and some latex binders with solids percentages of 40to 62%.

In order to investigate the dilution and dispersion ef-fects,5%of water by volume was added to the synthetic coating H to obtain the diluted synthetic coating H.Simi-larly,1%of dispersant (CALGON)by weight was added to the synthetic coating H to obtain the dispersed synthetic coating H.In addition,some data collected from a man-ufacturing facility dealing with casting 4cylinder blocks and head are also included in this study.

The coating samples were obtained by dipping a 100×100stainless steel mesh disc of 6.51cm diame-ter into the coating slurries,whose rheological properties were well controlled and studied.The steel mesh has very high permeability,which will not affect the measuring results for the coating permeability.The dipped coating discs were then dried at room temperature.After drying,the thickness of each coating was measured by using a 0–2.54cm micrometer (with a resolution of 0.00254mm).In order to investigate the oven-dry effects on the coating permeability,samples of coatings B and H that were dried at room temperature (25?C)and in an oven at 60?C were individually prepared for comparison purposes.

4.Results and discussion

https://www.sodocs.net/doc/946888458.html,parison of the Mercury Intrusion

Method and the Liquid Expulsion method Fig.2compares the pore side distributions measured by the Mercury Intrusion Method and Liquid Expulsion Method for coatings B and H.It shows that a major-ity of the intruded mercury (87%)volume for coating H correspond pores with a diameter of 5um or higher (up to 150um);while for coating B the pores with a diameter larger than 5um correspond to only 45%in-trusion of volume.This indicates that the pore diameters of coating B are smaller compared to the pore diameters of coating H.Based on theory discussed earlier,the ?l-ter ?ow percentage can be calculated as shown in Fig.2according to Equation 1,which shows that the detectable effective pores were smaller than 15um for both coat-ings B and H.It also shows that the pores of coating B are ?ner than those of coating H.Fig.3shows the ?ow

3405

Figure 2Comparison of pore size distributions determined by Mercury Intrusion Method and Liquid Expulsion

Method.

Figure 3Flow rate against applied pressure curves for coating B and H.

rate versus applied pressure curves obtained by the Liq-uid Expulsion Method for these two coatings (B and H).The air ?ow rate versus differential pressure data clearly show that coating H is more permeable than coating B.It can also be seen that the ?ow rate of the wet sample increases with increasing pressure as pores saturated ini-tially with Galwick are being emptied with higher gas pressure.In this study,considering the strength of coat-ing samples,the maximum pressure applied on the sam-ples was set at 76kpa.Although 76kPa was not high enough to expel Galwick from the wet sample pores completely,it was suf?cient to obtain the bubble pore

3406

size and the mean pore size information,with the mea-sured pressure range being identical for both coatings. Table I lists the comparison of pore size determined by the Mercury Intrusion Method and the Liquid Expulsion Method.It can be seen that the?ow factor is a valuable indicator to evaluate the transport properties of the re-fractory coatings.There are differences in microstructure information(pore size)determined by the Mercury Intru-sion Method and the Liquid Expulsion Method,in that the Mercury Intrusion Method shows relatively larger pores than those detected by the Liquid Expulsion Method.

It is not surprising that the results from the Mer-cury Intrusion Method and the Liquid Expulsion Method are not in quantitative agreement.In the Mercury In-trusion Method,when pressure increases,the mercury will intrude the bigger pores?rst and then the smaller pores,which does not take into consideration whether the pores are permeable to liquid or not.Therefore, the non-effective(blind)pores may be detected in the Mercury Intrusion Method,thereby contributing to the calculation of the pore size distribution.However,the Liq-uid Expulsion Method only measures the effective pores, which means the pore size distribution obtained by the Liquid Expulsion Method only accounts for the perme-able pores.For this reason,the Liquid Expulsion Method will be more suitable for the study of materials’transport properties,which is critical for refractory coating mate-rials used in LFC foundries.In reality,most of the pores in a porous medium will not be made of straight tubes of varying diameters.The typical pore channel shapes for a given coating are qualitatively illustrated in Fig.4.Pore type d shown in Fig.4is a blind pore,which will not contribute to the transport properties;however,the Mer-cury Intrusion Method will still measure it.The Liquid Expulsion Method only detects those pores which are to-tally open through the coating thickness;therefore,pores a–c in Fig.4will be detected only if the pressure reaches a certain point to push the liquid out through the con-stricted portion of the pore channels.Thus,the pore size measured by the Liquid Expulsion Method is the smallest diameter of the whole pore channel.However,the Mer-cury Intrusion Method may consider such a pore as several different-sized pores.For example,pore a and b will be individually considered as3pores of different sizes.Pore c might be detected as dozens of pores varying in size. In order to analyze small pores,very high pressure is applied in the Mercury Intrusion Method,which may dis-tort the microstructure of tested samples[21].The high pressure may deform some pores and even make them collapse.In addition,the Mercury Intrusion Method has a relatively low resolution at larger pore sizes[29].Mea-surements of the maximum pore size(bubble pore size) by the Mercury Intrusion Method will not be as accurate as those obtained from the Liquid Expulsion Method.The differences mentioned above explain the reasons that the Mercury Intrusion Method might give relatively larger size ranges for pores than those detected by the Liquid Expulsion Method.

Although differences exist between the Mercury In-trusion Method and the Liquid Expulsion Method,both methods tend to indicate that coating H had relatively larger pores than coating B,which is also con?rmed by images obtained from the Scanning Electron Microscope. Comparing Figs5and6,it can be seen that the surface of coating B is fairly smooth,while the surface of coating H is particularly rough.It is reasonable to assume that particle shape is one of the factors in?uencing pore size distribution.Coating B is mainly based on mica,which is?aky;while the majority of particles in coating H are silica,which is bulky.Bulky particles might more easily tend to construct voids between particles,which form tun-nels for gas/liquid to pass through.Since any porous mate-rial may contain both?ow-through pores and blind-pores, the maximum of the PSD obtained from liquid-expulsion porometry is usually shifted toward smaller pores as com-pared with mercury intrusion technique[30].

4.2.Pore shape factor

From Figs5and6,it can also be seen that most of the pores do not have cross-section that mimics a circle,an implicit assumption for interpretation.Therefore,a pore shape factor is often proposed to consider the non-circular cross section.If the pore section is considered to be ellip-

T A B L E I Comparison of pore size determined by Mercury intrusion method and liquid expulsion method

Thickness Bubble

pressure(KPa)

Permeability

coef?cient Flow factor Bubble pore size(um)Mean pore size(um)

Sample(mm)LEM LEM MIP LEM MIP(Darcy)(Darcy/mm) Coating B0.559 5.7411.15149.00 1.06 4.410.0130.022

Coating H0.503 3.8616.59146.00 2.0118.900.027

0.053

Figure4In?uences of pore channel shape on pore size determination.

3407

Figure 5Surface microstructures image of coating

B.

Figure 6Surface microstructure image of coating H.

tical with minor axis d and major axis nd ,the following relationship exists:

d S

dV

=

1d ·8·(1+n )n 2

(5)

The pore shape factor can be de?ned as

λ=d D

=

1+n 2·n (6)

Some typical values of the pore shape factor are listed

in Table II .In the following part of this paper,all the pore sizes have been assumed to have n value of 7,and thus the results based on cylindrical pore shape are multiplied using a pore shape factor of 0.715.

4.3.Correlation between bubble pore size,

mean pore size and ?ow factor

In this work,it was found that useful relationships exist between bubble pore size,mean pore size and ?ow fac-tor.As shown in Fig.7,the mean pore size increases as

3408

T A B L E I I Pore shape factor

Pore cross section

n

Shape factor λ(d =λD

)

1

12

0.7914

0.7297

0.714

Figure 7Bubble pore size vs.mean pore size for coating B and H.

the bubble pore size increases for coating B and H.The data collected at a manufacturing facility using the liquid expulsion technique described in this paper for coatings I,LB,LH and T are shown in Fig.8.These data show that mean pore size increases with the increased bub-ble pore size.However,coating LH did not demonstrate this trend signi?cantly,which might be attributed to the bulky-shaped particles in coating LH.The majority of the particles in coating I,LB and T were ?aky-shaped particles,mica.During the dipping and drying process,the ?aky-shaped particles might demonstrate relatively organized orientations,which might cause the consistent trend between bubble pore sizes and mean pore sizes.However,coating LH mainly consisted of bulky-shaped particles,silica.During the dipping and drying process,these bulky-shaped particles might have all kinds of ori-entations,which might disrupt the trend between bubble pore sizes and mean pore sizes.

A strong relationship was also observed between ?ow factor,bubble pore size and mean pore size as shown in Fig.9through Fig.13,which indicates that it is possible to predict the transport properties (?ow factor in this study)by measuring the microstructure information (pore size in this study)of refractory LFC coatings.As shown in Fig.11,linear regression gives R 2=0.81for an assumed linear relationship between ?ow factor and mean pore size for coatings

B and H,which suggests that 81%of the changes in ?ow factor can be explained by the changes of mean pore size for the samples prepared and studied in the laboratory of the authors.In contrast,the data col-lected at a manufacturing process control facility for 8types of commercial refractory LF

C coatings as shown in Fig.12seem to ?t two linear trends,both of which demon-strate fairly good linearity (R 2≥0.81).In addition,the linear regression equations obtained for 8types of com-mercial refractory LFC coatings seem to work fairly well for coating I,LB,LH and T,which are the refractory LFC coatings currently used at this metal casting facility.Although R 2=0.32is relatively poor for coating LH,the variations between the predicted ?ow factor using the

3409

Figure 8Bubble pore size vs.mean pore size for coating I,LB,LH and

T.

Figure 9Flow factor vs.bubble pore size for coating B and H.

linear equation in Fig.12and the measured ?ow factor are within ±30%,as shown in Fig.14.The reason for the inconsistent behavior for coating LH is not clear yet;however,the overall results do imply that the linear re-lationship between ?ow factor and mean pore size does exist but might not be able to be predicted by a unique

equation that is universal to coating component varia-tions.The analysis of the bubble pore size and mean pore size data provides valuable insight for understanding a relationship between the microstructure and the transport properties of these complex multi-component refractory LFC coatings.

3410

Figure 10Flow factor vs.bubble pore size for coating I,LB,LH and

T.

Figure 11Flow factor vs.mean pore size for coating B and H.

4.4.Effect of dilution and dispersion

In LFC foundries,the coating slurries shipped from suppliers are normally concentrated,and have a viscosity higher than what is used for actual coating purposes.

Generally,operators in LFC foundries will add water and/or dispersant to these concentrated slurries to obtain desirable rheological data (?ows well,does not drip,and levels without sagging).Therefore,it is essential

3411

Figure12Flow factor vs.mean pore size for various coatings.

to investigate the effects of dilution and dispersion on the transport properties of refractory coatings.In this study,5%of water by volume was added to the synthetic coating H to obtain diluted synthetic coating H.Similarly,1%of dispersant(CALGON)by weight was added to the synthetic coating H to obtain the dispersed synthetic coating H.Results shown in Table III suggest that adding dispersant may reduce the bubble pore size

as

Figure13Flow factor vs.mean pore size for coating I,LB,LH and T.

3412

Figure14Percent variance of predicted?ow factor for coating LH.

well as mean pore size;correspondingly,the?ow factor declines.In contrast,adding only water tends to increase the bubble pore size and mean pore size,which simul-taneously raises the?ow factor.This study suggests that adding dispersant will reduce the pore size and transport properties although adding dispersant might get similar rheological performance(viscosity values at a target rpm)as can be obtained by simply diluting with water.

4.5.Effect of drying process

Generally,oven and air drying are two practical ap-proaches used in LFC foundries.Table IV shows the comparison data for two drying techniques for the two coatings B and H.Oven drying at60?C slightly increases the bubble pore size as well as the mean pore size;however,it does not signi?cantly affect the transport properties(?ow factor).Therefore,it is reasonable to con-clude that oven versus air drying processes do not have substantial differences on the pore size and transport prop-erties.It will be interesting to perform similar studies for other drying techniques such as freeze and critical point drying.This could shed new light on obtaining desirable properties by varying the drying process.The equipment and procedures developed in this study will be valuable for generating such data.

5.Conclusion

In this study,the applicability of the Liquid Expulsion Method was investigated for refractory LFC coatings.The results have shown that the Liquid Expulsion Method is more suitable to characterize the“effective pore”https://www.sodocs.net/doc/946888458.html,pared to the Mercury Intrusion Method,the Liquid Expulsion Method has the following advantages: (1)No toxic liquid(Mercury)is used;(2)It is a non-destructive test;the sample is not damaged or contam-inated;(3)Only effective pores are detected;therefore, this technique is more appropriate to characterize the mi-crostructure of porous material for transport behavior. Results from this study have also suggested that useful relationships can be derived between?ow factor,bubble pore size and mean pore size.This has implications for using fewer variables such as a bubble pore size and mean pore size as good indicators to understand the relationship between the microstructure and the transport properties of refractory LFC coatings.The present study also found that the dilution and dispersion have opposing in?uences on the pore size and permeability.The dispersant should be used cautiously in LFC foundries because it might reduce the transport properties of the refractory coatings.No sig-ni?cant differences between oven and air dry processes were found for interpreted and measured parameters us-ing Liquid Expulsion Method for refractory coatings used in Lost Foam Casting.

SYMBOLS LIST

d1pore diameter corresponding to applied pressure P1

d2pore diameter corresponding to applied pressure P2

Q w1?ow rate measured for wet sample corresponding to applied pressure P1

3413

T A B L E I I I Dilution and dispersion effects on pore structure

Sample Thickness

(mm)

Bubble pore size

(um)

Mean pore size

(um)

Permeability

coef?cient(Darcy)

Flow factor

(Darcy/mm)

Coating H diluted0.43216.23 1.510.0280.065 Coating H dispersed0.30110.570.830.0100.035 Coating H original0.43611.10 1.320.0200.047 T A B L E I V Comparison of oven-dry and room-dry process results

Sample Thickness

(mm)

Bubble pore size

(um)

Mean pore size

(um)

Permeability

coef?cient(Darcy)

Flow factor

(Darcy/mm)

Oven-dry coating B0.4808.750.850.0160.033 Room-dry coating B0.4798.270.750.0160.033 Oven-dry coating H0.50210.55 1.190.0240.048 Room-dry coating H0.4949.71 1.100.0200.040

Q w2?ow rate measured for wet sample corresponding to applied pressure P2

Q d1?ow rate measured for dry sample corresponding to applied pressure P1

Q d2?ow rate measured for dry sample corresponding to applied pressure P2

P1applied pressure at point1

P2applied pressure at point2

ρ?uid density

k1Darcian(viscous)permeability coef?cient

k2non-Darcian(inertia)permeability coef?cient

ν?uid velocity

Q volumetric?ow rate

A sample cross-sectional area

μthe viscosity of the?uid

P i the pressure at the sample entrance

P o the pressure at the sample exit

P the?uid pressure at which Q andμare measured or calculated

L sample thickness

dS differential of pore area

dV differential of pore volume

d minor axis of elliptical or por

e diameter

n the ratio of major axis to minor axis

λPore Shape Factor

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the?nancial sup-port received from the US Department of Energy and New York State Energy Research Development Author-ity(NYSERDA)under the project NICEEE(DE-FG41-01R110926),and help from General Motors Powertrain. The authors would also like to gratefully acknowledge the involvement,support and encouragement from the project team members:Mr.Ross M.Johnson,Dr.Calvin C.John-son,Mrs.Joanna Jenack,Mr.Mahboob Murshed,and Mr. Mark Hoover.The authors would also like to thank the lost foam coating suppliers for providing the refractory coatings,Dr.Xiaohu Tang for assistance with the Scan-ning Electron Microscope and Dr.Jingyao Cao for sharing some valuable opinions.The opinions expressed in this paper are only those of listed authors and do not re?ect the opinions of the acknowledged team members or project sponsors

Reference

1.S.-I.NA K AO,J Membr Sci96(1994)131.

2.Y.L E E,J.J E O N G,I.J.YO U N and W.H.L E E,ibid.130(1997)

149.

3.C.Z H AO,X.Z H O U and Y.Y U E,Desalination129(2000)107.

4.C.G E L I NA S and R.A N G E R S,Am.Ceram.Soc.Bull.65(1986)

1297.

5.J.R.B ROW N,Met.Mater.8(1992)550.

6.C.A.G O R I A,G.C A I RO N I and G.T O S I,Trans Amer Foundry-

men’s Soc94(1986)589.

7.S.S H I V K U M A R,L.WA N G and D.A P E L I A N,J Mater.Novem-

ber(1990)38.

8.Y.S U N,H.-L.T S A I and D.R.A S K E L A N D,Trans Amer

Foundrymen’s Soc.100(1992)297.

9.H.L I T T L E T O N,B.M I L L E R,D.S H E L D O N and C.BAT E S,

Found Manag&Technol125(1997)41.

10.J.L I U,C.W.R A M S AY and D.R.A S K E L A N D,Trans Amer

Foundrymen’s Soc105(1998)419.

11.C.E.BAT E S,J.A.G R I F F I N and H.E.L I T T L E T O N,“Expend-

able pattern casting,Casting defects manuals”(American Foundry-men’s Society,1994).

12.S.B E N N E T T,T.M O O DY,A.V R I E Z E,M.JAC K S O N,D.R.

A S K E L A N D and C.W.R A M S AY,Trans Amer Foundrymen’s Soc

108(2000)795.

13.M.A.T S C H O P P,Q.G.WA N G and M.J.D E W Y S E,ibid.110

(2002)1371.

14.J.L I U,C.W.R A M S AY and D.R.A S K E L A N D,AFS Transac-

tions139(1997)435.

15.ASTM-D4284,in“Standard Test Method for Determining Pore V olume

Distribution of Catalysts by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry”,(ASTM Committee D-32on Catalysts,Conshohocken,PA,1994).

16.ASTM-D2873,in“Standard Test Method for Interior Porosity of

Poly(Vinyl Chloride)(PVC)Resins by Mercury Intrusion Porosime-try”(ASTM Committee D-20on Plastics,Conshohocken,PA,1994).

17.ASTM-D4404,in“Standard Test Method for Determining of Pore V ol-

ume and Pore V olume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury In-trusion Porosimetry”(ASTM Committee D-18on Soil and Rock,Con-shohocken,PA,1994).

18.DIN66133,in“Determination of Pore V olume Distribution and Speci?c

Surface Area of Solids by Mercury Intrusion(in German)”(Deutsches Institute Fur Normung e.V,1993).

3414

19.S.L OW E L L and J.E.S H I E L D S,in“Powder Surface Area and

Porosity”(Chapman&Hall,New York,1998).

20.E.W.WA S H B U R N,Phys.Rev.17(1921)273.

21.A.H E R NA N D E Z,J.I.C A LVO,P.P R A DA N O S and E.T E J E-

R I NA,J Membr Sci112(1996)1.

22.H.B E C H H O L D,M.S C H L E S I N G E R,K.S I L B E R E I S E N,

L.M A J E R and W.N U R N B E R G E R,Kolloid Z.55(1931) 172.

23.ASTM-D6767-02,in“Standard Test Method for Pore Size Character-

istics of Geotextiles by Capillary Flow Test”(ASTM Committee D35 on Geosynthetics,Conshohocken,PA,2002).

24.ASTM-F316-03,in“Standard Test Method for Pore Size Characteris-

tics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test”

(ASTM Committee D19on Water,Conshohocken,PA,2003).25.BS-7591,in“Porosity and Pore Size Distribution of Materials:Part4.

Method of Evaluation by Liquid Expulsion”(British Standards Institu-tion,1993).

26.A.K.J E NA and K.M.G U P TA,J Power Sour80(1999)46.

27.X.C H E N and D.P E N U M A D U,J Mater Res(2006)in Review.

28.P.F O R C H H E I M E R,Z.Ver.Deutsch,Ing.45(1901)1782.

29.K.V E N K ATA R A M A N,W.T.C H OAT E,E.R.T O R R E and R.

D.H U S U N G,J Membr Sci39(1988)259.

30.O.S L O C OVA,H.S NA J DAU F OVA and P.S C H N E I D E R,Microp

Mesop Mater65(2003)209.

Received3November2004

and accepted7July2005

3415

关于欣赏的名人名言

关于欣赏的名人名言 本文是关于名人名言的,仅供参考,如果觉得很不错,欢迎点评和分享。 关于欣赏的名人名言 1、美貌常常比酒更坏,因为它能使持有者和欣赏者双方沉醉。——齐默尔曼 2、而你欣赏我因我本性不会改,别太认真,认真怎可放开自在。——林夕 3、人生犹如一本书,愚蠢者草草翻过,聪明人细细阅读。为何如此。因为他们只能读它一次。人生无益于人类,便是无价值的。 4、路是脚踏出来的,历史是人写出来的。人的每一步行动都在书写自己的历史。——吉鸿昌 5、一个不欣赏自己的人,是难以快乐的。——三毛 6、人生的价值,即以其人对于当代所做的工作为尺度。——徐玮 7、你要欣赏自己的价值,就得给世界增添价值。——歌德 8、人生天地之间,若白驹过隙,忽然而已。人生是最伟大的宝藏,我晓得从这个宝藏中选取最珍贵的珠宝。 9、春蚕到死丝方尽,人至期颐亦不休。一息尚存须努力,留作青年好范畴。——吴玉章 10、人生应该如蜡烛一样,从顶燃到底,一直都是光明的。——

萧楚女 11、人的一生可能燃烧也可能腐朽,我不能腐朽,我愿意燃烧起来!——奥斯特洛夫斯基 12、风前有恨梅千点,沙上无人月一痕。——谭知柔《晚醉口占》 13、我给我母亲添了不少乱,但是我认为她对此颇为享受。——马克·吐温 14、恨芳菲世界,游人未赏,都付与,莺和燕。——陈亮 15、在孩子们的口头心里,母亲就是上帝的名字。——萨克雷 16、欣赏,这就是为着一件事物本身而爱好它,不为旁的理由。——达·芬奇 17、你若要喜爱你自己的价值,你就得给世界创造价值。——歌德 18、我们往往只欣赏自然,很少考虑与自然共生存。——王尔德 19、人生就象弈棋,一步失误,全盘皆输,这是令人悲哀之事;而且人生还不如弈棋,不可能再来一局,也不能悔棋。人生就是跋涉,人生就是开拓,人生就是与苦难争斗角逐;假如因我们承受苦难,能使后代免于受苦,那就是我们无上的幸福。 20、世界上的一切光荣和骄傲,都来自母亲。——高尔基 21、我之所有,我之所能,都归功于我天使般的母亲。——林肯

英美文学专业开题报告

英美文学专业开题报告 引导语:各民族的文学中都有许多惊险、恐怖的故事,但似乎没有哪一种文学像英美文学那样不仅创作出数量众多、质量优秀的恐怖文学作品,而且还形成了一个持续发展、影响广泛的哥特传统。以下 是的为大家找到的英美文学专业开题报告。希望能够帮助到大家! 论文题目theApplicationandInnovation 一、选题的意义和研究现状 1.选题的目的、理论意义和现实意义长时期以来,人们视艾米莉?勃朗特为英国文学中的“斯芬克斯”。关于她本人和她的作品都有很多难解之谜,许多评论家从不同的角度、采用不同的方法去研究,得出了不同的结论,因而往往是旧谜刚解,新谜又出,解谜热潮似永无休止。 本文立足于欧美文学中的哥特传统研究《呼啸山庄》的创作源泉,指出艾米莉?勃朗特在主题、人物形象、环境刻画、意象及情节构造等方面都借鉴了哥特传统,同时凭借其超乎寻常的想象力,将现实 与超现实融为一体,给陈旧的形式注入了激烈情感、心理深度和新鲜 活力,达到了哥特形式与激情内容的完美统一,使《呼啸山庄》既超越了哥特体裁的“黑色浪漫主义”,又超越了维多利亚时代的“现实主义”,从而展现出独具一格、经久不衰的艺术魅力。 2.与选题相关的国内外研究和发展概况 各民族的文学中都有许多惊险、恐怖的故事,但似乎没有哪一种文学像英美文学那样不仅创作出数量众多、质量优秀的恐怖文学作品,而且还形成了一个持续发展、影响广泛的哥特传统

(Gothictradition)。哥特文学现在已经成为英美文学研究中的一个重要领域。对哥特文学的认真研究开始于20世纪二三十年代,到70年代以后,由于新的学术思潮和文学批评观念的影响,该研究出现了前所未有而且日趋高涨的热潮。 根据在国际互联网上的搜索,到2000年9月为止,英美等国的学者除发表了大量关于哥特文学的论文外,还至少出版专著达184部,其中1970年以后为126部,仅90年代就达59部,几乎占总数的三分之一。当然,近年来哥特文学研究的状况不仅在于研究成果迅速增加,更重要的是它在深度和广度方面都大为拓展,并且把哥特传统同英美乃至欧洲的历史、社会、文化和文学的总体发展结合起来。 二、研究方案 1.研究的基本内容及预期的结果(大纲)研究的基本内容:本文立足于欧美文学中的哥特传统研究《呼啸山庄》的创作源泉,指出艾米莉?勃朗特在主题、人物形象、环境刻画、意象及情节构造等方面都借鉴了哥特传统,同时凭借其超乎寻常的想象力,将现实与超现实融为一体,给陈旧的形式注入了激烈情感、心理深度和新鲜活力,达到了哥特形式与激情内容的完美统一,使《呼啸山庄》既超越了哥特体裁的“黑色浪漫主义”,又超越了维多利亚时代的“现实主义”,从而展现出独具一格、经久不衰的艺术魅力。 预期的结果(大纲): 1.ASurveyofGothic1.1DefinitionofGothic 1.2theOriginofGothicNovels

关于时间管理的英语作文 manage time

How to manage time Time treats everyone fairly that we all have 24 hours per day. Some of us are capable to make good use of time while some find it hard to do so. Knowing how to manage them is essential in our life. Take myself as an example. When I was still a senior high student, I was fully occupied with my studies. Therefore, I hardly had spare time to have fun or develop my hobbies. But things were changed after I entered university. I got more free time than ever before. But ironically, I found it difficult to adjust this kind of brand-new school life and there was no such thing called time management on my mind. It was not until the second year that I realized I had wasted my whole year doing nothing. I could have taken up a Spanish course. I could have read ten books about the stories of successful people. I could have applied for a part-time job to earn some working experiences. B ut I didn’t spend my time on any of them. I felt guilty whenever I looked back to the moments that I just sat around doing nothing. It’s said that better late than never. At least I had the consciousness that I should stop wasting my time. Making up my mind is the first step for me to learn to manage my time. Next, I wrote a timetable, setting some targets that I had to finish each day. For instance, on Monday, I must read two pieces of news and review all the lessons that I have learnt on that day. By the way, the daily plan that I made was flexible. If there’s something unexpected that I had to finish first, I would reduce the time for resting or delay my target to the next day. Also, I would try to achieve those targets ahead of time that I planed so that I could reserve some more time to relax or do something out of my plan. At the beginning, it’s kind of difficult to s tick to the plan. But as time went by, having a plan for time in advance became a part of my life. At the same time, I gradually became a well-organized person. Now I’ve grasped the time management skill and I’m able to use my time efficiently.

初中语文古文赏析曹操《短歌行》赏析(林庚)

教育资料 《短歌行》 《短歌行》赏析(林庚) 曹操这一首《短歌行》是建安时代杰出的名作,它代表着人生的两面,一方面是人生的忧患,一方面是人生的欢乐。而所谓两面也就是人生的全面。整个的人生中自然含有一个生活的态度,这就具体地表现在成为《楚辞》与《诗经》传统的产儿。它一方面不失为《楚辞》中永恒的追求,一方面不失为一个平实的生活表现,因而也就为建安诗坛铺平了道路。 这首诗从“对酒当歌,人生几何”到“但为君故,沉吟至今”,充分表现着《楚辞》里的哀怨。一方面是人生的无常,一方面是永恒的渴望。而“呦呦鹿鸣”以下四句却是尽情的欢乐。你不晓得何以由哀怨这一端忽然会走到欢乐那一端去,转折得天衣无缝,仿佛本来就该是这么一回事似的。这才是真正的人生的感受。这一段如是,下一段也如是。“明明如月,何时可掇?忧从中来,不可断绝。越陌度阡,枉用相存。契阔谈宴,心念旧恩。月明星稀,乌鹊南飞。绕树三匝,何枝可依。”缠绵的情调,把你又带回更深的哀怨中去。但“山不厌高,海不厌深”,终于走入“周公吐哺,天下归心”的结论。上下两段是一个章法,但是你并不觉得重复,你只觉得卷在悲哀与欢乐的旋涡中,不知道什么时候悲哀没有了,变成欢乐,也不知道什么时候欢乐没有了,又变成悲哀,这岂不是一个整个的人生吗?把整个的人生表现在一个刹那的感觉上,又都归于一个最实在的生活上。“我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙”,不正是当时的情景吗?“周公吐哺,天下归心”,不正是当时的信心吗? “青青子衿”到“鼓瑟吹笙”两段连贯之妙,古今无二。《诗经》中现成的句法一变而有了《楚辞》的精神,全在“沉吟至今”的点窜,那是“青青子衿”的更深的解释,《诗经》与《楚辞》因此才有了更深的默契,从《楚辞》又回到《诗经》,这样与《鹿鸣》之诗乃打成一片,这是一个完满的行程,也便是人生旅程的意义。“月明星稀”何以会变成“山不厌高,海不厌深”?几乎更不可解。莫非由于“明月出天山”,“海上生明月”吗?古辞说:“枯桑知天风,海水知天寒”,枯桑何以知天风,因为它高;海水何以知天寒,因为它深。唐人诗“一叶落知天下秋”,我们对于宇宙万有正应该有一个“知”字。然则既然是山,岂可不高?既然是海,岂可不深呢?“并刀如水,吴盐胜雪”,既是刀,就应该雪亮;既是盐,就应该雪白,那么就不必问山与海了。 山海之情,成为漫漫旅程的归宿,这不但是乌鹊南飞,且成为人生的思慕。山既尽其高,海既尽其深。人在其中乃有一颗赤子的心。孟子主尽性,因此养成他浩然之气。天下所以归心,我们乃不觉得是一个夸张。 .

英语演讲稿:未来的工作

英语演讲稿:未来的工作 这篇《英语演讲稿范文:未来的工作》,是特地,希望对大家有所帮助! 热门演讲推荐:竞聘演讲稿 | 国旗下演讲稿 | 英语演讲稿 | 师德师风演讲稿 | 年会主持词 | 领导致辞 everybody good afternoon:. first of all thank the teacher gave me a story in my own future ideal job. everyone has a dream job. my dream is to bee a boss, own a pany. in order to achieve my dreams, i need to find a good job, to accumulate some experience and wealth, it is the necessary things of course, in the school good achievement and rich knowledge is also very important. good achievement and rich experience can let me work to make the right choice, have more opportunities and achievements. at the same time, munication is very important, because it determines whether my pany has a good future development. so i need to exercise their municative ability. i need to use all of the free time to learn

名人名言摘抄及赏析

名人名言摘抄及赏析 名人名言以其深邃的哲理、丰富的内涵为人们广泛传诵,所以,值得我们摘抄并赏析。今天为你分享的是名人名言摘抄及赏析的内容,希望你会喜欢! 1) 形成天才的决定因素应该是勤奋.;;郭沫若 2) 学到很多东西的诀窍,就是一下子不要学很多.;;洛克 3) 自己的鞋子,自己知道紧在哪里.;;西班牙 4) 不要等待运气降临,应该去努力掌握知识。;;弗兰明 5) 人不能象走兽那样活着,应该追求知识和美德。;;但丁 6) 荣誉和财富,若没有聪明才智,是很不牢靠的财产。;;德谟克里特 7) 有教养的人的遗产,比那些无知的人的财富更有价值。;;德谟克里特 8) 知识是珍贵宝石的结晶,文化是宝石放出来的光泽。;;泰戈尔 9) 知识有如人体血液一样的宝贵。人缺少了血液,身体就要衰弱,人缺少了知识,头脑就要枯竭。;;高士其 10) 与其夸大胡说,不如宣布那个聪明的、智巧的、谦逊的警句:“我不知道”。;;伽利略 11) 人的理想志向往往和他的能力成正比。;;约翰逊 12) 人所缺乏的不是才干而是志向,不是成功的能力而是勤劳的

意志。;;部尔卫 13) 勇敢坚毅真正之才智乃刚毅之志向。;;拿破仑 14) 书卷多情似故人,晨昏忧乐每相亲。;;于谦 15) 读万卷书,行万里路。;;刘彝 16) 三人行,必有我师也。择其善者而从之,其不善者而改之。;;孔子 17) 知之者不如好之者,好之者不如乐之者。;;孔子 18) 敏而好学,不耻下问。;;孔子 19) 学而不思则罔,思而不学则殆。;;孔子 20) 外韧之味,久则可厌;读书之味,愈久愈深。;;程颐 名人名言摘抄及赏析(经典篇)1) 劳于读书,逸于作文。;;元代;程端礼 2) 读书如行路,历险毋惶恐。;;《清诗铎;读书》 3) 书读百遍,其义自见。;;晋;陈寿 4) 三日不读,口生荆棘;三日不弹,手生荆棘。;;清;朱舜水 5) 业精于勤,荒于嬉;行成于思,毁于随。;;韩愈 6) 鸟欲高飞先振翅,人求上进先读书。;;李苦禅 7) 艺术是一种使我们达到真实的假想。;;毕加索 8) 思考的意思是:亲近自己。;;乌纳木诺 9) 我们破灭的希望,流产的才能,失败的事业,受了挫折的雄心,往往积聚起来叫做嫉妒。;;巴尔扎克 10) 夜空挂满了星星,月亮像一只钓鱼的小船,仿佛航行在宽阔

完善版美国文学期末重点

2014 Final Exam Study Guide for American Literature Class Plan of Final Exam 1.Best Choice Question 10% 2.True or False Question 10% 3.Definition 10% 4.Give Brief Answers to Questions 30% 5.Critical Comments 40% American Literature Review Poe’s Poetic Ideas; Major Ideas in Emerson’s “Nature”; Whitman’s Style; Formal Features of Dickinson’s Poetry; Analysis of “Miniver Cheevy” by Edwin Arlington Robinson; Comment on “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” by Robert Frost; Naturalistic reading of Sister Carrie by Theodore Dreiser; The Theme and Techniques in Eliot’s “The Waste Land”; Theme and Technique in The Great Gatsby by Fitzgerald; Comment on Hemingway’s style and theme in A Farewell to Arms; Analysis of “Dry September” by William Faulkner; Literary terms: Transcendentalism American Naturalism The Lost Generation The Jazz Age Free Verse The Iceberg Analogy

高中语文文言文曹操《短歌行(对酒当歌)》原文、翻译、赏析

曹操《短歌行【对酒当歌】》原文、翻译、赏析译文 原文 面对美酒应该高歌,人生短促日月如梭。对酒当歌,人生几何? 好比晨露转瞬即逝,失去的时日实在太多!譬如朝露,去日苦多。 席上歌声激昂慷慨,忧郁长久填满心窝。慨当以慷,忧思难忘。 靠什么来排解忧闷?唯有狂饮方可解脱。何以解忧?唯有杜康。 那穿着青领(周代学士的服装)的学子哟,你们令我朝夕思慕。青青子衿,悠悠我心。 正是因为你们的缘故,我一直低唱着《子衿》歌。但为君故,沉吟至今。 阳光下鹿群呦呦欢鸣,悠然自得啃食在绿坡。呦呦鹿鸣,食野之苹。 一旦四方贤才光临舍下,我将奏瑟吹笙宴请宾客。我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙。 当空悬挂的皓月哟,你运转着,永不停止;明明如月,何时可掇? 我久蓄于怀的忧愤哟,突然喷涌而出汇成长河。忧从中来,不可断绝。 远方宾客踏着田间小路,一个个屈驾前来探望我。越陌度阡,枉用相存。 彼此久别重逢谈心宴饮,争着将往日的情谊诉说。契阔谈讌,心念旧恩。 明月升起,星星闪烁,一群寻巢乌鹊向南飞去。月明星稀,乌鹊南飞。 绕树飞了三周却没敛绕树三匝,何枝

翅,哪里才有它们栖身之 所? 可依? 高山不辞土石才见巍 峨,大海不弃涓流才见壮阔。(比喻用人要“唯才是举”,多多益善。)山不厌高,水不厌深。 只有像周公那样礼待贤 才(周公见到贤才,吐出口 中正在咀嚼的食物,马上接 待。《史记》载周公自谓: “一沐三握发,一饭三吐哺, 犹恐失天下之贤。”),才 能使天下人心都归向我。 周公吐哺,天 赏析 曹操是汉末杰出的政治家、军事家和文学家,他雅好诗章,好作乐府歌辞,今存诗22首,全是乐府诗。曹操的乐府诗多描写他本人的政治主张和统一天下的雄心壮志。如他的《短歌行》,充分表达了诗人求贤若渴以及统一天下的壮志。 《短歌行》是政治性很强的诗作,主要是为曹操当时所实行的政治路线和政策策略服务的,但是作者将政治内容和意义完全熔铸在浓郁的抒情意境之中,全诗充分发挥了诗歌创作的特长,准确而巧妙地运用了比兴手法,寓理于情,以情感人。诗歌无论在思想内容还是在艺术上都取得了极高的成就,语言质朴,立意深远,气势充沛。这首带有建安时代"志深比长""梗概多气"的时代特色的《短歌行》,读后不觉思接千载,荡气回肠,受到强烈的感染。 对酒当歌,人生几何? 譬如朝露,去日苦多。 慨当以慷,幽思难忘。 何以解忧,唯有杜康。 青青子衿,悠悠我心。 但为君故,沈吟至今。 呦呦鹿鸣,食野之苹。 我有嘉宾,鼓瑟吹笙。 明明如月,何时可掇? 忧从中来,不可断绝。 越陌度阡,枉用相存。 契阔谈,心念旧恩。 月明星稀,乌鹊南飞, 绕树三匝,何枝可依? 山不厌高,海不厌深, 周公吐哺,天下归心。 《短歌行》是汉乐府的旧题,属于《相和歌?平调曲》。这就是说它本来是一个乐曲的名称,这种乐曲怎么唱法,现在当然是不知道了。但乐府《相和歌?平调曲》中除了《短歌行》还有《长歌行》,唐代吴兢《乐府古题要解》引证古诗“长歌正激烈”,魏文帝曹丕《燕歌行》“短歌微吟不能长”和晋代傅玄《艳歌行》“咄来长歌续短歌”等句,认为“长歌”、“短

关于坚持的英语演讲稿

关于坚持的英语演讲稿 Results are not important, but they can persist for many years as a commemoration of. Many years ago, as a result of habits and overeating formed one of obesity, as well as indicators of overall physical disorders, so that affects my work and life. In friends to encourage and supervise, the participated in the team Now considered to have been more than three years, neither the fine rain, regardless of winter heat, a day out with 5:00 time. The beginning, have been discouraged, suffering, and disappointment, but in the end of the urging of friends, to re-get up, stand on the playground. 成绩并不重要,但可以作为坚持多年晨跑的一个纪念。多年前,由于庸懒习惯和暴饮暴食,形成了一身的肥胖,以及体检指标的全盘失常,以致于影响到了我的工作和生活。在好友的鼓励和督促下,参加了晨跑队伍。现在算来,已经三年多了,无论天晴下雨,不管寒冬酷暑,每天五点准时起来出门晨跑。开始时,也曾气馁过、痛苦过、失望过,但最后都在好友们的催促下,重新爬起来,站到了操场上。 In fact, I did not build big, nor strong muscles, not a sport-born people. Over the past few years to adhere to it, because I have a team behind, the strength of a strongteam here, very grateful to our team, for a long time, we encourage each other, and with sweat, enjoying common health happy. For example, Friends of the several run in order to maintain order and unable to attend the 10,000 meters race, and they are always concerned about the brothers and promptly inform the place and time, gives us confidence and courage. At the same time, also came on their own inner desire and pursuit for a good health, who wrote many of their own log in order to refuel for their own, and inspiring. 其实我没有高大身材,也没健壮肌肉,天生不属于运动型的人。几年来能够坚持下来,因为我的背后有一个团队,有着强大团队的力量,在这里,非常感谢我们的晨跑队,长期以来,我们相互鼓励着,一起流汗,共同享受着健康带来的快

名言警句赏析

名言警句赏析 本文是关于名人名言的,仅供参考,如果觉得很不错,欢迎点评和分享。 名言警句赏析 1、高岸为谷,深谷为陵。--《诗经·十月之交》 赏析: 高地变成山谷,深谷变成山陵。据科学推测,喜马拉雅山这个地方在七千万年以前还是一片汪洋大海,沧海变桑田,比喻世事多变。也比喻事物在一定的条件下总是向它相反的方面转化。 2、工欲善其事,必先利其器。一一《论语·卫灵公》 赏析: 工匠要想做好自己的工作,必须事先磨快工具。由此可知,一个人要胜任工作,必须首先学好本领。今日读好书,来日才能大展鸿图。 3、躬自厚而薄责于人。一一《论语·卫灵公》 赏析: 多责备自己,而少责备别人。这句话说的是要严以律己,宽以待人。严格要求自己,进步就快;宽容别人,就会远离怨恨。躬自:自己。“厚”后省略了一个“责”字。责:责备,要求。 4、爱人者,人恒爱之;敬人者,人恒敬之。--《孟子。离娄下》 赏析: 爱人的人别人总是爱他,尊敬别的人别人总是尊敬他。你怎样对待别

人,别人也往往会用同样的态度对待你。要想受人敬爱,必须敬爱他人。恒:常常。 2、躬自厚而薄责于人。--《论语。卫灵公》 赏析: 多责备自己,而少责备别人。这句话说的是要严以律己,宽以待人。严格要求自己,进步就快;宽容别人,就会远离怨恨。躬自:自己。“厚”后省略了一个“责”字。责:责备,要求。 3、好而知其恶,恶而知其美。--《礼记。大学》 赏析: 对你所喜欢的人,要知道他的缺点,不可偏袒;对你所厌恶的人,要知道他的优点,不可抹杀。我们评价一个人要客观公正,不要感情用事,不要因为自己的好、恶而产生偏见。好hào:喜爱。前“恶”è:缺陷和丑恶。后“恶”wù:讨厌,憎恨。 4、人一能之,己百能之;人十能之,己千能之。--《礼记。中庸》 赏析: 别人花一分力气就能学好的,自己就花百分的力气学好它;人家花十分的力气能学好的,自己就花千分的力气学好它。这句话说明人要自强,不甘落后。有了自强的心态,必然会勤奋,“勤能补拙”,原本不够聪明的人也会聪明起来了。 5、为者常成,行者常至。--《晏子春秋内篇。杂下》 赏析:

高中英语选修课:英语文学欣赏 Sister Carrie 学生版讲义资料

Chapter III WEE QUESTION OF FORTUNE--FOUR-FIFTY A WEEK Once across the river and into the wholesale district, she glanced about her for some likely door at which to apply. As she contemplated the wide windows and imposing signs, she became conscious of being gazed upon and understood for what she was--a wage-seeker. She had never done this thing before, and lacked courage. To avoid a certain indefinable shame she felt at being caught spying about for a position, she quickened her steps and assumed an air of indifference supposedly common to one upon an errand. In this way she passed many manufacturing and wholesale houses without once glancing in. At last, after several blocks of walking, she felt that this would not do, and began to look about again, though without relaxing her pace. A little way on she saw a great door which, for some reason, attracted her attention. It was ornamented by a small brass sign, and seemed to be the entrance to a vast hive of six or seven floors. "Perhaps," she thought, "They may want some one," and crossed over to enter. When she came within a score of feet of the desired goal, she saw through the window a young man in a grey checked suit. That he had anything to do with the concern, she could not tell, but because he happened to be looking in her direction her weakening heart misgave her and she hurried by, too overcome with shame to enter. Over the way stood a great six- story structure, labelled Storm and King, which she viewed with rising hope. It was a wholesale dry goods concern and employed women. She could see them moving about now and then upon the upper floors. This place she decided to enter, no matter what. She crossed over and walked directly toward the entrance. As she did so, two men came out and paused in the door. A telegraph messenger in blue dashed past her and up the few steps that led to the entrance and disappeared. Several pedestrians out of the hurrying throng which filled the sidewalks passed about her as she paused, hesitating. She looked helplessly around, and then, seeing herself observed, retreated. It was too difficult a task. She could not go past them. So severe a defeat told sadly upon her nerves. Her feet carried her mechanically forward, every foot of her progress being a satisfactory portion of a flight which she gladly made. Block after block passed by. Upon streetlamps at the various corners she read names such as Madison, Monroe, La Salle, Clark, Dearborn, State, and still she went, her feet beginning to tire upon the broad stone flagging. She was pleased in part that the streets were bright and clean. The morning sun, shining down with steadily increasing warmth, made the shady side of the streets pleasantly cool. She looked at the blue sky overhead with more realisation of its charm than had ever come to her before. Her cowardice began to trouble her in a way. She turned back, resolving to hunt up Storm and King and enter. On the way, she encountered a great wholesale shoe company, through the broad plate windows of which she saw an enclosed executive

关于管理的英语演讲

1.How to build a business that lasts100years 0:11Imagine that you are a product designer.And you've designed a product,a new type of product,called the human immune system.You're pitching this product to a skeptical,strictly no-nonsense manager.Let's call him Bob.I think we all know at least one Bob,right?How would that go? 0:34Bob,I've got this incredible idea for a completely new type of personal health product.It's called the human immune system.I can see from your face that you're having some problems with this.Don't worry.I know it's very complicated.I don't want to take you through the gory details,I just want to tell you about some of the amazing features of this product.First of all,it cleverly uses redundancy by having millions of copies of each component--leukocytes,white blood cells--before they're actually needed,to create a massive buffer against the unexpected.And it cleverly leverages diversity by having not just leukocytes but B cells,T cells,natural killer cells,antibodies.The components don't really matter.The point is that together,this diversity of different approaches can cope with more or less anything that evolution has been able to throw up.And the design is completely modular.You have the surface barrier of the human skin,you have the very rapidly reacting innate immune system and then you have the highly targeted adaptive immune system.The point is,that if one system fails,another can take over,creating a virtually foolproof system. 1:54I can see I'm losing you,Bob,but stay with me,because here is the really killer feature.The product is completely adaptive.It's able to actually develop targeted antibodies to threats that it's never even met before.It actually also does this with incredible prudence,detecting and reacting to every tiny threat,and furthermore, remembering every previous threat,in case they are ever encountered again.What I'm pitching you today is actually not a stand-alone product.The product is embedded in the larger system of the human body,and it works in complete harmony with that system,to create this unprecedented level of biological protection.So Bob,just tell me honestly,what do you think of my product? 2:47And Bob may say something like,I sincerely appreciate the effort and passion that have gone into your presentation,blah blah blah-- 2:56(Laughter) 2:58But honestly,it's total nonsense.You seem to be saying that the key selling points of your product are that it is inefficient and complex.Didn't they teach you 80-20?And furthermore,you're saying that this product is siloed.It overreacts, makes things up as it goes along and is actually designed for somebody else's benefit. I'm sorry to break it to you,but I don't think this one is a winner.

曹操《短歌行》其二翻译及赏析

曹操《短歌行》其二翻译及赏析 引导语:曹操(155—220),字孟德,小名阿瞒,《短歌行 二首》 是曹操以乐府古题创作的两首诗, 第一首诗表达了作者求贤若渴的心 态,第二首诗主要是曹操向内外臣僚及天下表明心迹。 短歌行 其二 曹操 周西伯昌,怀此圣德。 三分天下,而有其二。 修奉贡献,臣节不隆。 崇侯谗之,是以拘系。 后见赦原,赐之斧钺,得使征伐。 为仲尼所称,达及德行, 犹奉事殷,论叙其美。 齐桓之功,为霸之首。 九合诸侯,一匡天下。 一匡天下,不以兵车。 正而不谲,其德传称。 孔子所叹,并称夷吾,民受其恩。 赐与庙胙,命无下拜。 小白不敢尔,天威在颜咫尺。 晋文亦霸,躬奉天王。 受赐圭瓒,钜鬯彤弓, 卢弓矢千,虎贲三百人。 威服诸侯,师之所尊。 八方闻之,名亚齐桓。 翻译 姬昌受封为西伯,具有神智和美德。殷朝土地为三份,他有其中两分。 整治贡品来进奉,不失臣子的职责。只因为崇侯进谗言,而受冤拘禁。 后因为送礼而赦免, 受赐斧钺征伐的权利。 他被孔丘称赞, 品德高尚地位显。 始终臣服殷朝帝王,美名后世流传遍。齐桓公拥周建立功业,存亡继绝为霸 首。

聚合诸侯捍卫中原,匡正天下功业千秋。号令诸侯以匡周室,主要靠的不是 武力。 行为磊落不欺诈,美德流传于身后。孔子赞美齐桓公,也称赞管仲。 百姓深受恩惠,天子赐肉与桓公,命其无拜来接受。桓公称小白不敢,天子 威严就在咫尺前。 晋文公继承来称霸,亲身尊奉周天王。周天子赏赐丰厚,仪式隆重。 接受玉器和美酒,弓矢武士三百名。晋文公声望镇诸侯,从其风者受尊重。 威名八方全传遍,名声仅次于齐桓公。佯称周王巡狩,招其天子到河阳,因 此大众议论纷纷。 赏析 《短歌行》 (“周西伯昌”)主要是曹操向内外臣僚及天下表明心 迹,当他翦灭群凶之际,功高震主之时,正所谓“君子终日乾乾,夕惕若 厉”者,但东吴孙权却瞅准时机竟上表大说天命而称臣,意在促曹操代汉 而使其失去“挟天子以令诸侯”之号召, 故曹操机敏地认识到“ 是儿欲据吾著炉上郁!”故曹操运筹谋略而赋此《短歌行 ·周西伯 昌》。 西伯姬昌在纣朝三分天下有其二的大好形势下, 犹能奉事殷纣, 故孔子盛称 “周之德, 其可谓至德也已矣。 ”但纣王亲信崇侯虎仍不免在纣王前 还要谗毁文王,并拘系于羑里。曹操举此史实,意在表明自己正在克心效法先圣 西伯姬昌,并肯定他的所作所为,谨慎惕惧,向来无愧于献帝之所赏。 并大谈西伯姬昌、齐桓公、晋文公皆曾受命“专使征伐”。而当 今天下时势与当年的西伯、齐桓、晋文之际颇相类似,天子如命他“专使 征伐”以讨不臣,乃英明之举。但他亦效西伯之德,重齐桓之功,戒晋文 之诈。然故作谦恭之辞耳,又谁知岂无更讨封赏之意乎 ?不然建安十八年(公元 213 年)五月献帝下诏曰《册魏公九锡文》,其文曰“朕闻先王并建明德, 胙之以土,分之以民,崇其宠章,备其礼物,所以藩卫王室、左右厥世也。其在 周成,管、蔡不静,惩难念功,乃使邵康公赐齐太公履,东至于海,西至于河, 南至于穆陵,北至于无棣,五侯九伯,实得征之。 世祚太师,以表东海。爰及襄王,亦有楚人不供王职,又命晋文登为侯伯, 锡以二辂、虎贲、斧钺、禾巨 鬯、弓矢,大启南阳,世作盟主。故周室之不坏, 系二国是赖。”又“今以冀州之河东、河内、魏郡、赵国、中山、常 山,巨鹿、安平、甘陵、平原凡十郡,封君为魏公。锡君玄土,苴以白茅,爰契 尔龟。”又“加君九锡,其敬听朕命。” 观汉献帝下诏《册魏公九锡文》全篇,尽叙其功,以为其功高于伊、周,而 其奖却低于齐、晋,故赐爵赐土,又加九锡,奖励空前。但曹操被奖愈高,心内 愈忧。故曹操在曾早在五十六岁写的《让县自明本志令》中谓“或者人见 孤强盛, 又性不信天命之事, 恐私心相评, 言有不逊之志, 妄相忖度, 每用耿耿。

相关主题