Available online at https://www.sodocs.net/doc/bf11469605.html,/2005/2/e11
doi: 10.2349/biij.1.2.e11
biij
Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal
IMAGING-SURGICAL CORRELATION
Necrotising epididymo-orchitis with scrotal abscess
M Muttarak*, MD, W Na Chiangmai, MD, P Kitirattrakarn, MD
Departments of Radiology and Surgery, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Received 19 August 2005; accepted 26 September 2005
HISTORY
A 55-year-old man presented with a painful left scrotal enlargement and fever for 6 weeks. He was treated with antibiotics at the community hospital. His fever and scrotal pain were improved but the scrotum became enlarged. He was referred to our hospital to have testicular tumour ruled out. He had history of left renal calculi and urethral stricture with off and on urinary tract infection. Physical examination revealed left scrotal erythema with an enlarged, tender left scrotum. Laboratory investigations were notable for mild elevation of blood urea nitrogen 36 mg/dL (normal 7-24 mg/dL), and creatinine 1.7 mg/dL (normal 0.6-1.6 mg/dL). Urinalysis revealed cloudy urine with numerous white blood cells and red blood cells. Blood leucocyte count was 6.9 ×103per dL with 59.6% neutrophils, 31.8% lymphocytes, and 3.5% monocytes. Urine culture showed no growth of organism. Scrotal ultrasonography (US) was performed. The patient underwent left orchiectomy. His post-operative period was uneventful. One month later, left nephrolithotomy was performed.
IMAGING FINDINGS
Scrotal US showed a normal right testis and epididymis (Figure 1a). The left testis was small with inhomogeneous echogenicity and loss of normal surrounding contour (Figure 1b). The left scrotal skin was thickened. A complex echoic mass in the left scrotal sac with connection to the left testis (Figure 2) was * Corresponding author. Present address: Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand. Tel.: +66-53-945450; Fax.: 66-53-217144; E-mail: mmuttara@mail.med.cmu.ac.th (Malai Muttarak). demonstrated, compatible with scrotal abscess. Colour Doppler US at the left hemiscrotum showed increased peritesticular flow but no intratesticular flow (Figure 3).
(a)
(b)
This page number is not for citation purposes
Figure 1(a) Longitudinal US scan of the right hemiscrotum shows a normal homogeneous echoic epididymis (E) and testis (T). The testicular contour is well defined; (b) Longitudinal US scan of the left hemiscrotum shows an inhomogeneous small testis (T) with loss of normal well-defined contour. The scrotal skin is thickened on the left side compared to the right side.
Figure 2Transverse US scan of the left hemiscrotum shows an inhomogeneous small testis (T), an inhomogeneous echoic tract (thick arrows) connecting to the scrotal abscess (thin arrows), which is seen as a complex echoic mass.
Figure 3Colour Doppler US of the left testis shows increased peritesticular vascularity but absence of intravascularity indicating testicular ischemia.
SURGICAL FINDINGS
At operation, the scrotal skin was thickened and inflamed. There was thick pus in the left scrotal sac (Figure 4). The left testis and epididymis were necrotic (Figure 5). Left orchiectomy was performed.
(a)
(b)
Figure 4 At operation, (a) thick pus was found in the left scrotum; and (b) the left testis was necrotic (arrow).
DISCUSSION
Epididymitis and epididymo-orchitis are two most common causes of acute scrotal pain in adults. The infection usually originates in the genitourinary tract, particularly the bladder, urethra, and prostate. The most common pathogens are Neisseria gonorrhoea, Chlamydia trachomatis, Escherichia coli, or Proteus mirabilis. The inflammation usually starts in the epididymis and then spreads to the testis [1-3]. If the patients do not receive appropriate treatment it could result in many complications including pyocoele, testicular infarction, testicular abscess, scrotal abscess, and fulminant fasciitis (Fournier’s gangrene) [1].
Patients with epididymo-orchitis usually present with fever, dysuria, and a painful scrotal enlargement. The pain is usually insidious in onset and increases slowly over 1 to several days. Physical examination may not be possible to differentiate the epididymis and testis due to pain and swelling, making it difficult to evaluate the real extent of the lesion. Differential diagnosis with acute testicular torsion can sometimes be a problem
This page number is not
for citation purposes because of similar clinical presentation. US with colour
Doppler is helpful in evaluating these patients to prevent
unnecessary surgical exploration [1-4]. Grayscale US
findings of epididymo-orchits are enlarged hypoechoic
epididymis and testis. These findings are non-specific
and indistinguishable from testicular torsion but colour
Doppler US findings are different. Vascularity is
increased in epididymo-orchits but decreased in testicular
torsion. However, advanced epididymo-orchitis may
cause testicular infarction as a result of extrinsic
compression of testicular vascular supply by enlarged
epididymis and spermatic cord and pyocoele [1,4-6],
therefore, intratesticular vascularity is decreased. This
finding suggests the need for surgical intervention. In
addition, severe epididymo-orchitis may also cause
testicular abscess and scrotal abscess, which is
demonstrated as a complex echoic mass.
The presented case shows a severe epididymo-
orchitis spreading from a urinary tract infection
complicated with testicular necrosis and scrotal abscess.
REFERENCES
1.Feld R, Middleton WD. Recent advances in sonography of the
testis and scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:1033-51.
2.Muttarak M, Lojanapiwat B. The painful scrotum: an
ultrasonographical approach to diagnosis. Singapore Med J
2005;46:352-7.
3.Dogra VS, Gottlieb RH, Oka M, et al. Sonography of the scrotum.
Radiology 2003;227:18-36.
4.Pavlica P, Barozzi L. Imaging of the acute scrotum. Eur Radiol
2001;11:220-8.
5.Horstman WG. Scrotal imaging. Urol Clin North Am 1997;24:653-
71.
6.Berman JM, Beidle TR, Kunberger LE, et al. Sonographic
evaluation of acute intrascrotal pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol
1996;166:857-61.