雅思议论文范文

Essay类型5种：阐述观点型，利弊型，同意不同意型，问题分析型，讨论型。

1.Some people think the university education is to prepare students for employment. Others think it has other function. Discuss and give your opinion.

2.Many people are afraid of leaving their houses because of the spread of crimes. Some people

think that more actions can be taken by the government to prevent crime from occuring. But others think little can be done. What is your opinion?

3.Water rescources around the world are falling deficient.

Analyse the possible reasons and provide your suggestions.

4.Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and

uses up the world’s fuel resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

5.Differences between countries are becoming less evident nowadays. People tend ot have the

same films, music, brands, TV channels,etc. To what extent do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?

https://www.sodocs.net/doc/4d16156651.html,panies should encourage old employees(55years old) to retire,in order to give

opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

7.We have been living in the nuclear age now for over half a century. Since the first atomic

bombs were developed, nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet. Yet the technology has been put to positive use as an energy source and in certain areas of medicine. To what extent is nuclear technology a danger to life on Earth? What are the benefits and risks assocated with its use?

雅思essay写作注意的要点：

Essay 评分标准：

观点正确，结构清晰；

论点论据充分；

连贯性；

长度250-280；

VSS并注重多变性

语法，主谓结构一定不能出错

五种类型

同意不同意类

利弊性

讨论性Discuss

问题分析

阐述个人观点（也可划在前面的类型中）

注意问题：

1.倒向一方面：完全同意，或完全不同意，要兼顾；中立可分同意段，不同意段；

2利弊性与同意性相当

3. 讨论性Discuss

Body1支持观点，并提供论点，至少两个，Body2: 支持观点，并提供论点，至少两个.

结论段可以给出个人观点，可能会出三个答案；

4.提出问题并给出解决办法

第一段可以全部写原因

第二段可全部写出办法

或body1Reason Body2ReasonBody3Solution或问题分析第三种结构：问题两段，办法一段

范文

1.Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? （问题分析型）结构

I think it is true that in almost every country today each household and family produces a large amount of waste every week. Most of this rubbish comes from the packaging from the things we buy, such as processed food. But even if we buy fresh food without packaging, we still produce rubbish from the plastic bags used everywhere to carry shopping home.

The reason why we have so much packaging is that we consume so much more on a daily basis than families did in the past. Convenience is also very important in modern life, so we buy packaged or canned food that can be transported from long distances and stored until we need it, first in the supermarket, and then at home.

However, the amount of waste produced is also a result of our tendency to use something once and throw it away. We forget that even the cheapest plastic bag has used up valuable resources and energy to produce. We also forget that it is a source of pollution and difficult to dispose of.

I think, therefore, that governments need to raise this awareness in the general public. Children can be educated about environmental issues at school, but adults need to take action. Governments can encourage such action by putting taxes on packaging, such as plastic bags, by providing recycling services and by fining households and shops that do not attempt to recycle their waste.

With the political will, such measures could really reduce the amount of rubbish we produce. Certainly nobody wants to see our resources used up and our planet poisoned by waste.

2.题目：Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others argue that happiness depends on completely other factors. Discuss both of the views and give your own opinion.（Discuss 型）

In recent years, the discussion of whether personal happiness is directly associated to( economic success has become a controversial issue. Notions toward it differ widely from person to person.

(1. no copying—paraphase--)词；句式结构-varitey)

Body1 ：Some people believe that happiness is related to economic success because only money can make people’s life more enjoyable. When it comes to economic success, the majority of people believe that money means a luxurious life. To begin with, if someone owns great success on economic, that means he can spend more money on whatever he likes and spend more time on his hobbies. (结构—linking—具体的信息)) Emotionally, money can buy happiness at least to some extent. That is to say, you can buy things that you like in order to fulfill your needs and vanities and this makes you feel happier. You can also enjoy the best education and social welfare. Thirdly, economic success implies high social class and status, which can make people feel happy and respectable.

(51ielts.

Opponents, however, hold the view that happiness does not depend on economic success but completely other factors. First of all, numerous studies show that happy individuals are successful across multiple life domains, including marriage, income, work performance and health.

The happiness exists not only because economic success makes people happy, but also because positive affect

and have to face the dangers of starvation and exposure,

the happy spirit. Last but not least, money can not buy everything, such as friendship, true love and health. You can buy things corporeal, but you can never spend money to ask for more time.

In the final analysis, both sides have sound foundations. However, if asked to make a choice, I will not hesitate to assent to the latter. I firmly believe that happiness is not only related to economic success but also links to other factors which are much more significant.

3.Topic: Should government invest poor population or hi-tech research.阐述观点型

Government investment has been put on more and more emphasis since people’s gradual awareness of its importance. The discussion of whether the government should investigate in Hi-Tech products or on poor people become fierce among different people. In my opinion, this is a dilemma which cannot be easily decided. However, the poor people should be concerned first.

People is the most fundamental aspect to form the society, thus they deserve more emphasis. It was our ancestors who first lit a fire with wood and bring light and culture to this world. And it is due to this, society was gradually formed and developed as we can see today. We can not ignore the significant role that people play in the long history of this world, therefore, as the central machine of country, government is responsible for every person in the society, and it should concern those who are poor and give them necessary help.

In addition, poverty will make the society unstable. Because of poverty, many people tend to steal or rub with the purpose of making a living, which highly increase the crime rate. Being desperate, some of them become more assailable, with their brain full of resentment and envy. As a result, they find killing an innocent person or lit a fire on other’s house is a good way of releasing their anger, and that’s what we often see in the news. If our government don’t investigate on them, we can not imagine what our society will be like.

Moreover, using a lot of money on Hi-Tech in a country which still has a large poor population is a waste of money. To produce a large number of Hi-Tech products will certainly lead to the result of detaining in stores because people have neither money nor emotion to enjoy the luxuries. When poor people are making every effort to make their ends meet, the government have no reason not to give a hand in them but put money on wasteful research or explore on Hi-Tech products.

To sum up, investigating on poor people’ benefit overweigh using money on Hi-Tech products. It is better to make poor people rich first, and then enjoy the pleasure that

Hi-Tech bring to us.

4. Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

International tourism is booming: millions of tourists go to other countries to explore the outside world. Tourism enhances the mutual understanding between the local people and tourists. Some people hold opposite opinions. They think that international tourism causes tension rather than promoting understanding between people from different cultures.

The people holding the latter view suppose that tourists are likely to offend the local people because of the lack of knowledge of the local customs, which differ from their own. Moreover, tourism inevitably harms the natural resources and the cultural legacy, which may lead to the resentment of the local people.

However, I can hardly assent to this idea: the above mentioned rarely happens. In my opinion, international tourism does encourage the understanding between people from different countries. For one thing, without going to see for themselves, people may never know what other countries are really like and thus can be misled by hearsay or films and TV programmes, which, more often than not, are one-sided. For instance, one of my American friends told me that most Americans had a strange bias against the Russian people until some young Americans traveled to Russia and saw with their own eyes that the Russians are human beings just like them. Another example is that, with the development of Chinese tourism, people outside China start to realize that Chinese men no longer have long braids and Chinese women’s feet are of normal size now. Secondly, having seen the fine scenery or experienced the rich culture of other countries, tourists will have the desire to develop a good relationship with the locals, which certainly contributes to the understanding between them.

In conclusion, instead of causing tension, international tourism furthers the understanding of people from different countries. (281 words)

6. Companies should encourage old employees (55 years old) to retire, in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, plenty of employees who are more than 55 years old must retire because of company policy; therefore, many people think that the development of a company cannot be separated from the number of young employees. The above point is certainly true; this essay will outline three reasons.

The main reason is that plenty of young employees mean that the company is infused with lots of young blood. With the development of technology, more and more new technological products have been developed. The new generation masters advanced technology and have the energy to exploit. They have learned lots of knowledge in the university; therefore it is definitely useful for the development of companies.

Another reason is that old employees cannot adapt themselves to the rapid pace. Old employees find it difficult to learn new things rapidly. With their limited physical strength, they are not capable of heavy manual work. So old employees are not a patch on young employees, it means not only intellect but also physical strength.

Last but not the least reason is that old employees have already worked for more than half of their lifetime, so they should retire to enjoy life. The old employees have already paid out too much in order to look after their families and careers. So they should pursue their hobbies.

In conclusion, old employees shouldn’t continue working for themselves. Moreover, advancement of society needs a new generation.

7.In recent years, more and more advertisements have been flooding into our lives. Some advertisements exert negative effects on the youth. Therefore some people suggest that be banned. To what extent do you think the disadvantages outweigh the Give your reasons.(利弊型)

Along with the rapid progress of society, the advertising industry has undergone remarkable development. Every day we are surrounded by all kinds of ads and commercials, which have a profound influence on our daily lives. As a result, there arises a fierce debate concerning the proposal that we should ban all kinds of advertisements.

On one hand, some people are in favor of the idea that advertisement should not be banned; instead it should be further developed. They are of the opinion that advertisement is a good channel which helps promote the exchanges of information. In an era of information, everyone can benefit a lot from the advertisements, not only the manufacturers but the customers. Moreover, the advertisement enables people to catch up with the amazing advance in all fields. From the mushrooming advertisements, people get to know some newest products and the trend of consumption. Thirdly, advertising, to some extent, is not only an industry but an art. Many advertisements are elaborate works of art full of ingenuity and originality, which render great spiritual pleasure to the viewers and add to the picturesque cityscape. In a word, the advertisement is a blessing for modern people.

Despite the benefits advertisement has brought us, many people strongly condemn it, saying that they have been fed up with all kinds of rubbish ads. They call for a comprehensive ban on the advertisement based on the following reasons. First of all, a majority of advertisements are fictitious and misleading, causin g confusion in people’s daily life and even leading to the injury and death of some customers. Secondly, they bring many inconveniences and troubles to us. For example, are you pleased with a mailbox stuffed with unwanted ads or a wonderful film on TV being interrupted frequently? Furthermore, the non-standard use of language in advertisement brings about irreparable damage to the integrity and purity of our language. Consequently, it will exert a disastrous impact on the literacy of our younger generations. In some people’s eyes, the advertisement is just a Genie out of the bottle.

To be frank, it is quite impossible for people to reach an absolute consensus on most controversial issues. To my mind, a total ban on advertisement is not an ideal and practical choice. How can we imagine all advertisements vanishing overnight? The demerits should by no means make us lose sight of the benefits advertisements have brought to us. A more workable and rational attitude should be adopted; that is, to eliminate the fa lse and retain the true. Always bear in mind the old saying:“never throw away the baby with bath water.”

8.Topic：Should secondary school have a class of international news? Some people think it is waste of time, while others think it is necessary. To some extent, do you agree or disagree, and why?

What does the significant role of education play in the cultivation of children? It is generally believed that education should function as a pattern which makes students

well-educated and full of knowledge. However, I argue that education should make people mature and learned in and out of class.

It is the international news class that broadens and widens the horizons when students are being asked some big issues. When recently lots of people concern about the Iran nuclear issue, some secondary school students, or even college students say: “it’s none of my business, just kick this out of my mind, it’s not that serious.” But what if you saw the international news report about 1986 Chernoby Nuclear Accident, the human disaster, you would probably say that let those nuclear plans shut down. Therefore, international

news can drive the information and events which later students experienced similarly can use to be more intellectual and mature.

Moreover, students can learn something very important beyond book knowledge from the international news, such as general compassion. For instance, a couple of months ago, there is a beyond-thought tsunami attacking eastern Asia, including Indonesia, Thailand, and parts of Malaysia. After this near-death experience, great help comes from all over the world, from which the main make-up is student. The example is simple, but tells great: Students look at the pictures and desperate faces of the people there from international news, which triggers their feelings, and then they begin to realize what a wonderful life they have and should shine a beam of light on these poor people----- compassion. Generally, students learned how important to show compassion to others.

To sum up, international news class appeared to be a way of wasting time, but students learned. They would probably tell you how their lives changed after this class. And I assert that international news class should be there, in the secondary schools.

9.Topic:

Should criminals be sent to prison or should they do something else as a punishment? Explain your opinion and give your reasons.

sent to a jail:

The world would be in great chaos and full of blood and violence. It is the best deterrent to crime. They will think twice before they commit a crime. The decline of crime has a direct correlation with the implementation of the practice. It serves a just reward for the heartless and merciless malefactors while a great spiritual comfort to the victim’s family. The abolition of the practice will send out a misleading message that anyone can kill and get away with it.

I am in favor of the former view that we should retain the time-honored catholicon to ensure a safe and comfortable living environment to all these law-abiding citizens. An old saying best expresses my attitude:“Mercy to the criminal many be cruelty to the people.”make up for, dangerous

It is hard to guarantee that they have really repented of their crimes. If it turns out (结果发现) that they just pretend they repent and start anew and actually they commit crimes again, the loss and the damage to the victims will be irreparable. And also, if the police

want the behaviour of the criminals to be under control, they have to spend money and time in supervising the criminals after they are set free. Furthermore, once the criminals commit crimes again, it will take the police much trouble to catch them.

It is a great deterrence for many potential criminals. Compared with the deprivation of freedom, letting the criminals do something else as punishment is too mild.

It makes the violent robber think twice before pulling the trigger(扣动扳机). Otherwise, it will send out a misleading message that anyone can kill and get away with （逃脱处罚）it.

情绪，贯穿于我们的生活之中。由于生理的不同，与男性相比，女性情感活动更强烈，也更容易情绪化。

如果说父亲在家庭中扮演的是掌舵者、领导人的角色，那么母亲则是一个家庭的调节阀、供氧机。

虽然家庭的重担由父母双方共同承担，但与父亲相比，母亲承担更多。在工作与家庭双重压力下不少母亲感到力不从心，情绪也变得更加不稳定。

但母亲的情绪决定着一个家庭的温度，决定着一个家庭的和谐程度。首先从家庭生活中来看，女性温柔、细腻的特质可以在家庭生活中营造出一种暖意融融的气氛，在这种气氛下，再大的矛盾与困难都能克服。

如果说父亲是一把披荆斩棘的利剑，母亲则是一张情意绵绵的丝网，她用爱将家庭与外面漆黑冰冷的世界剥离开来。女性相较于男性而言，更善于表达内心情感，更懂得利用语言与情绪的力量，母亲的笑脸、暖言能给每个家庭成员力量。

每个孩子都是一块白纸，你想让他变成什么样子他就是什么样子，在孩子的成长过程中，母亲的影响是不可能替代的。

母亲是孩子情感依赖的主要角色，如果母亲在与孩子的接触中，不能控制自己的情绪，那么孩子长大之后很可能会情绪调节失衡。

有本书中说：“对大多数的成年人而言，即使一生只跟母亲发生过一次问题，心中就会存在一个说话、行为和反应跟童年时期一模一样的‘母亲复本’。”

母亲情绪不稳定，一会对孩子赞赏有加，一会对孩子大声呵斥，这会造成造成孩子长大后戒备心重，缺乏信任。总是对孩子抱怨，朝孩子吐苦水，也会把孩子变成一个消极的人。

母亲的情绪决定家庭的温度，在家庭生活中学会控制自己的情绪，要发火前深呼吸，以微笑面对家人，对待爱人、孩子多用表扬多夸奖，不要总是看到不足的地方。

在合肥张家，母亲陆英是个能很好控制自己的情绪的人。她自结婚后与丈夫从未红过脸，处处周到讨得婆婆欢心，对待儿女从不歇斯底里疾言厉色，她用自己良好的情绪为家庭及儿女成长撑起了一把保护伞。